Assessment of Energy flexibility based on different control methods on thermally activated system: a case study on zero-energy office building

Abstract Thermally Activated Building Systems (TABS) integrated with high-performance building envelopes offer significant potential for energy flexibility through demand response. However, such thermal inertia poses control challenges for cooling control. Model Predictive Control (MPC) has emerged as a promising solution, but the impact of different modeling mechanisms on control performance in the context of flexibility needs to be investigated. This study compares two adaptive MPC strategies based on grey-box and black-box models against conventional rule-based control (RBC) for a thermally activated ceiling cooling system in a zero-energy office building. The control framework are developed to minimize energy cost within the constraint of thermal comfort through setpoint regulation. A comprehensive assessment examines model accuracy, cost savings, and energy flexibility metrics to determine the performance of each control approach. Results show that grey-box MPC achieves superior performance with 38.0% cost reduction and 20.0% energy savings compared to RBC, while significantly improving energy flexibility with 33.3% higher flexibility factor and 141.7% increase in self-sufficiency. The black-box MPC demonstrates moderate improvements with 21.6% cost reduction and 14.1% energy savings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Physics Conference Series
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/3001/1/012022
Primary Topic
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of Energy flexibility based on different control methods on thermally activated system: a case study on zero-energy office building

Qiang Wei, Zhizhong Guo, Zesheng Yang, Jialu Li et al.
1 links
Journal of Physics Conference Series
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
article

Assessment of Energy flexibility based on different control methods on thermally activated system: a case study on zero-energy office building

Qiang Wei, Zhizhong Guo, Zesheng Yang, Jialu Li, Wu Deng, Xiaopeng Wang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Thermally Activated Building Systems (TABS) integrated with high-performance building envelopes offer significant potential for energy flexibility through demand response. However, such thermal inertia poses control challenges for cooling control. Model Predictive Control (MPC) has emerged as a promising solution, but the impact of different modeling mechanisms on control performance in the context of flexibility needs to be investigated. This study compares two adaptive MPC strategies based on grey-box and black-box models against conventional rule-based control (RBC) for a thermally activated ceiling cooling system in a zero-energy office building. The control framework are developed to minimize energy cost within the constraint of thermal comfort through setpoint regulation. A comprehensive assessment examines model accuracy, cost savings, and energy flexibility metrics to determine the performance of each control approach. Results show that grey-box MPC achieves superior performance with 38.0% cost reduction and 20.0% energy savings compared to RBC, while significantly improving energy flexibility with 33.3% higher flexibility factor and 141.7% increase in self-sufficiency. The black-box MPC demonstrates moderate improvements with 21.6% cost reduction and 14.1% energy savings.

Journal of Physics Conference SeriesVol. 3001(1)
University of Nottingham Ningbo China (CN), Zhejiang Province Institute of Architectural Design and Research (CN), Zhejiang University (CN)
Ningbo Municipal Bureau of Science and Technology
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.