AAC-Mediated Classroom Participation: Calling On and Coming Back

Students who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) systems experience participation barriers in fast-paced classroom discussions due to the extensive time required to compose and formulate contributions with AAC relative to spoken language. One instructional practice educators use is to call on a student who uses an AAC system to prepare a contribution while instruction continues and then come back for the student's response later. The principles of conversation analysis were used to record, transcribe, and analyze use of this call-on-and-come-back practice by a teacher and a speech and language pathologist during group instruction with a boy who used AAC. Using a participation framework, the analysis suggests the call-on-and-come-back practice did little to address the participation barriers and instead introduced new challenges to participation using an AAC system. Given that this practice promoted student exclusion, disengagement from the group discourse, competing demands for attention, and missed learning opportunities, caution should be used when considering its use with children who use AAC systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3138/jircd-2024-0013
Primary Topic
Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AAC-Mediated Classroom Participation: Calling On and Coming Back

Lori Geist, Karen A. Erickson, Nancy Quick
Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders
Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
article

AAC-Mediated Classroom Participation: Calling On and Coming Back

Lori Geist, Karen A. Erickson, Nancy Quick
article en

Abstract

Students who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) systems experience participation barriers in fast-paced classroom discussions due to the extensive time required to compose and formulate contributions with AAC relative to spoken language. One instructional practice educators use is to call on a student who uses an AAC system to prepare a contribution while instruction continues and then come back for the student's response later. The principles of conversation analysis were used to record, transcribe, and analyze use of this call-on-and-come-back practice by a teacher and a speech and language pathologist during group instruction with a boy who used AAC. Using a participation framework, the analysis suggests the call-on-and-come-back practice did little to address the participation barriers and instead introduced new challenges to participation using an AAC system. Given that this practice promoted student exclusion, disengagement from the group discourse, competing demands for attention, and missed learning opportunities, caution should be used when considering its use with children who use AAC systems.

Journal of Interactional Research in Communication DisordersVol. 15(4)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.