Business group affiliation and misreporting: evidence from Korean <i>chaebols</i>

While prior studies suggest that business groups actively manage their earnings, direct evidence on whether or how they ultimately violate accounting rules remains scarce. Our investigation of Korean business groups reveals a negative association between business group affiliation and detected misreporting propensity, unexpectedly signalling less detection of misreporting among group affiliates. However, further analyses indicate that misreporting complexity, captured by cases involving valuation of derivatives, private companies, and other complex financial instruments, may obscure detection of misreporting in business groups. We also find that within business groups, misreporting is disproportionately concentrated in affiliates positioned closer to controlling families on the pyramidal ownership chain, where it is more likely to benefit these controlling families. However, misreporting affiliates are rarely the ultimate parents. Overall, our findings suggest that business groups strategically balance the costs and benefits of misreporting to maximise gains for controlling owners while mitigating their exposure to legal and reputational risks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Accounting and Business Research
Published
2025-05-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2025.2488927
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Corporate Finance and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Business group affiliation and misreporting: evidence from Korean chaebols

Shahed Imam, Jae Hwan Ahn, Syed Zulfiqar Ali Shah
2 citations
Accounting and Business Research
Corporate Finance and Governance
7.82
article

Business group affiliation and misreporting: evidence from Korean chaebols

Shahed Imam, Jae Hwan Ahn, Syed Zulfiqar Ali Shah
article en
2 citations

Abstract

While prior studies suggest that business groups actively manage their earnings, direct evidence on whether or how they ultimately violate accounting rules remains scarce. Our investigation of Korean business groups reveals a negative association between business group affiliation and detected misreporting propensity, unexpectedly signalling less detection of misreporting among group affiliates. However, further analyses indicate that misreporting complexity, captured by cases involving valuation of derivatives, private companies, and other complex financial instruments, may obscure detection of misreporting in business groups. We also find that within business groups, misreporting is disproportionately concentrated in affiliates positioned closer to controlling families on the pyramidal ownership chain, where it is more likely to benefit these controlling families. However, misreporting affiliates are rarely the ultimate parents. Overall, our findings suggest that business groups strategically balance the costs and benefits of misreporting to maximise gains for controlling owners while mitigating their exposure to legal and reputational risks.

Accounting and Business Research
University of Huddersfield (GB), Inha University (KR), University of Birmingham (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Corporate Finance and Governance
7.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Business group affiliation and misreporting: evidence from Korean <i>chaebols</i> — Shahed Imam, Jae Hwan Ahn, et al. · Accounting and Business Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS