Effect of Pulpal Base, Restorative Material, and Preparation Type on Marginal and Internal Fit and Fracture Strength of Endocrowns

The aim of this innovative study was to investigate the feasibility of a modified butt joint preparation with two grooves instead of a ferrule when root dentin tissue is limited in mandibular molars. It was also investigated to what extent the effect of these treatment options on marginal and internal fit and fracture strength (FS) varied according to the type of material and whether or not a fiber ribbon was used at the base. Marginal and internal fit were evaluated using the triple-scan protocol. Statistical analysis was conducted via a three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The absolute marginal discrepancy (AMD), marginal discrepancy, and overall fit values for the ceramic group were 127 μm, 108 μm, and 120 μm, respectively, while corresponding values for the hybrid ceramic group were 139 μm, 116 μm, and 130 μm (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The mean FS recorded for ceramic restorations was 662 N, whereas hybrid ceramic restorations demonstrated a significantly higher FS of 903 N (<i>p</i> < 0.001). When material type was assessed independently of preparation design and base configuration, both ceramic and hybrid ceramic exceeded the predefined clinical acceptability threshold for AMD; however, they remained within acceptable limits for the remaining parameters. Among the evaluated configurations, hybrid ceramic restorations incorporating ferrules and fiber-reinforced bases exhibited the highest FS values, whereas ceramic restorations with modified biological widths and lacking fiber reinforcement yielded the lowest FS values.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Materials
Published
2025-05-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18092137
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of Pulpal Base, Restorative Material, and Preparation Type on Marginal and Internal Fit and Fracture Strength of Endocrowns

Fehmi Gönüldaş, özge çiloğlu, Sadık Kara, Erdem Özdemir et al.
Materials
Dental materials and restorations
article

Effect of Pulpal Base, Restorative Material, and Preparation Type on Marginal and Internal Fit and Fracture Strength of Endocrowns

Fehmi Gönüldaş, özge çiloğlu, Sadık Kara, Erdem Özdemir, Kerem Yılmaz, Hakan Aydın, Zeynep Bilen
article en

Abstract

The aim of this innovative study was to investigate the feasibility of a modified butt joint preparation with two grooves instead of a ferrule when root dentin tissue is limited in mandibular molars. It was also investigated to what extent the effect of these treatment options on marginal and internal fit and fracture strength (FS) varied according to the type of material and whether or not a fiber ribbon was used at the base. Marginal and internal fit were evaluated using the triple-scan protocol. Statistical analysis was conducted via a three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The absolute marginal discrepancy (AMD), marginal discrepancy, and overall fit values for the ceramic group were 127 μm, 108 μm, and 120 μm, respectively, while corresponding values for the hybrid ceramic group were 139 μm, 116 μm, and 130 μm (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The mean FS recorded for ceramic restorations was 662 N, whereas hybrid ceramic restorations demonstrated a significantly higher FS of 903 N (<i>p</i> < 0.001). When material type was assessed independently of preparation design and base configuration, both ceramic and hybrid ceramic exceeded the predefined clinical acceptability threshold for AMD; however, they remained within acceptable limits for the remaining parameters. Among the evaluated configurations, hybrid ceramic restorations incorporating ferrules and fiber-reinforced bases exhibited the highest FS values, whereas ceramic restorations with modified biological widths and lacking fiber reinforcement yielded the lowest FS values.

MaterialsVol. 18(9)
Ankara University (TR), Antalya Bilim University (TR)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.