Effect of individual preferences on 20-yard sprint performance in novice athletes: A quasi-experimental study

This study sought to investigate the effect of individual preferences on 20-yard sprint performance in novice athletes. Initially, 94 physically and mentally healthy female physical education students were randomly selected from the same university and age range. From this sample, 24 participants were randomly assigned to three groups of eight. In each group, the examiner determined the type of attentional instruction for the skill execution. The three groups were (1) no-focus/non-preference condition, (2) proximal-external focus/non-preference condition, and (3) distal-external focus/non-preference condition. Subsequently, the remaining 70 participants performed a 30-yard sprint under three attentional conditions (proximal-external, distal-external, and no-focus) as a trial run. Experiments were performed in the context of a 20-yard sprint task. Participants were instructed to have either a proximal-external focus (cones placed 5 yards apart) or a distal-external focus (the 20-yard finish line). Participants in the preference groups were asked to choose their preferred focus of attention, while in the non-preference groups, the experimenter assigned the attentional focus. The preference group demonstrated mean records of 4.04 (SD=0.06) seconds, 4.0 (SD=0.10) seconds, and 3.92 (SD=0.11) seconds, respectively. Under the same conditions, the non-preference group achieved mean times of 4.06 (SD=1.05) seconds, 4.03 (SD=0.09) seconds, and 3.92 (SD=0.09) seconds. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) on 20-yard sprint performance revealed a significant main effect for the type of attentional instruction (P=0.223, F=4.15). However, no significant main effect was found for preference type (P=0.250, F=1.33). Furthermore, the two factors had no significant interaction effect (P=0.879, F=1.29). A significant difference was found between the mean 20-yard sprint records under no-focus and distal-external focus (P=0.022). Additionally, no significant difference was observed between the mean 20-yard sprint times under distal-external and proximal-external focus conditions (P=0.175). These findings prove that distance's effect on attentional focus is a global phenomenon and does not depend on individual preferences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Sports and Rehabilitation Sciences.
Published
2025-05-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32598/jsrs.2501.1050
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of individual preferences on 20-yard sprint performance in novice athletes: A quasi-experimental study

behnam gholami, Amir Moghaddam, Mohammad Reza Rezaie, Seyyedeh Mahdiyeh Khastar et al.
Journal of Sports and Rehabilitation Sciences.
Sports Performance and Training
article

Effect of individual preferences on 20-yard sprint performance in novice athletes: A quasi-experimental study

behnam gholami, Amir Moghaddam, Mohammad Reza Rezaie, Seyyedeh Mahdiyeh Khastar, Seyede Haniyeh Khastar
article en

Abstract

This study sought to investigate the effect of individual preferences on 20-yard sprint performance in novice athletes. Initially, 94 physically and mentally healthy female physical education students were randomly selected from the same university and age range. From this sample, 24 participants were randomly assigned to three groups of eight. In each group, the examiner determined the type of attentional instruction for the skill execution. The three groups were (1) no-focus/non-preference condition, (2) proximal-external focus/non-preference condition, and (3) distal-external focus/non-preference condition. Subsequently, the remaining 70 participants performed a 30-yard sprint under three attentional conditions (proximal-external, distal-external, and no-focus) as a trial run. Experiments were performed in the context of a 20-yard sprint task. Participants were instructed to have either a proximal-external focus (cones placed 5 yards apart) or a distal-external focus (the 20-yard finish line). Participants in the preference groups were asked to choose their preferred focus of attention, while in the non-preference groups, the experimenter assigned the attentional focus. The preference group demonstrated mean records of 4.04 (SD=0.06) seconds, 4.0 (SD=0.10) seconds, and 3.92 (SD=0.11) seconds, respectively. Under the same conditions, the non-preference group achieved mean times of 4.06 (SD=1.05) seconds, 4.03 (SD=0.09) seconds, and 3.92 (SD=0.09) seconds. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) on 20-yard sprint performance revealed a significant main effect for the type of attentional instruction (P=0.223, F=4.15). However, no significant main effect was found for preference type (P=0.250, F=1.33). Furthermore, the two factors had no significant interaction effect (P=0.879, F=1.29). A significant difference was found between the mean 20-yard sprint records under no-focus and distal-external focus (P=0.022). Additionally, no significant difference was observed between the mean 20-yard sprint times under distal-external and proximal-external focus conditions (P=0.175). These findings prove that distance's effect on attentional focus is a global phenomenon and does not depend on individual preferences.

Journal of Sports and Rehabilitation Sciences.Vol. 2(3)
Amherst College (US), Islamic Azad University, Mashhad (IR), University of Massachusetts Amherst (US), Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.