Amplifying hybrid entangled states and superpositions of coherent states

We compare two amplification schemes, photon addition and then subtraction (<a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><a:mrow><a:mover accent="true"><a:mi>a</a:mi><a:mo>̂</a:mo></a:mover><a:msup><a:mover accent="true"><a:mi>a</a:mi><a:mo>̂</a:mo></a:mover><a:mo>†</a:mo></a:msup></a:mrow></a:math>) and successive photon addition (<d:math xmlns:d="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><d:mrow><d:msup><d:mover accent="true"><d:mi>a</d:mi><d:mo>̂</d:mo></d:mover><d:mo>†</d:mo></d:msup><d:msup><d:mrow/><d:mn>2</d:mn></d:msup></d:mrow></d:math>), applied to hybrid entangled states (HESs) and superpositions of coherent states (SCSs). We show that the fidelity and gain of the amplification schemes for HESs are the same as those of coherent states. However, SCSs show quite nontrivial behavior by the amplification schemes, depending on the amplitudes of coherent states, the number of coherent-state components, and the relative phases between the components. This implies that appropriate amplification schemes for SCSs should be chosen depending on the tasks and specific forms of the states. To investigate the quality of amplified states, we calculate the quantum Fisher information, a measure of quantum phase estimation. In terms of the quantum Fisher information, the <f:math xmlns:f="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><f:mrow><f:mover accent="true"><f:mi>a</f:mi><f:mo>̂</f:mo></f:mover><f:msup><f:mover accent="true"><f:mi>a</f:mi><f:mo>̂</f:mo></f:mover><f:mo>†</f:mo></f:msup></f:mrow></f:math> scheme tends to show better performance for relatively small amplitudes (<i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><i:mrow><i:mi>α</i:mi><i:mo>≲</i:mo><i:mn>0.9</i:mn></i:mrow></i:math>), while the <j:math xmlns:j="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><j:mrow><j:msup><j:mover accent="true"><j:mi>a</j:mi><j:mo>̂</j:mo></j:mover><j:mo>†</j:mo></j:msup><j:msup><j:mrow/><j:mn>2</j:mn></j:msup></j:mrow></j:math> scheme is better in the larger amplitude regime. The performance of the two schemes becomes indistinguishable as the amplitude grows sufficiently large.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. A/Physical review, A
Published
2025-05-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.111.053703
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Quantum Information and Cryptography
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Amplifying hybrid entangled states and superpositions of coherent states

Sungjoo Cho, InU Jeon, Hyunseok Jeong
1 citations
Physical review. A/Physical review, A
Quantum Information and Cryptography
2.48
article

Amplifying hybrid entangled states and superpositions of coherent states

Sungjoo Cho, InU Jeon, Hyunseok Jeong
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We compare two amplification schemes, photon addition and then subtraction (<a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><a:mrow><a:mover accent="true"><a:mi>a</a:mi><a:mo>̂</a:mo></a:mover><a:msup><a:mover accent="true"><a:mi>a</a:mi><a:mo>̂</a:mo></a:mover><a:mo>†</a:mo></a:msup></a:mrow></a:math>) and successive photon addition (<d:math xmlns:d="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><d:mrow><d:msup><d:mover accent="true"><d:mi>a</d:mi><d:mo>̂</d:mo></d:mover><d:mo>†</d:mo></d:msup><d:msup><d:mrow/><d:mn>2</d:mn></d:msup></d:mrow></d:math>), applied to hybrid entangled states (HESs) and superpositions of coherent states (SCSs). We show that the fidelity and gain of the amplification schemes for HESs are the same as those of coherent states. However, SCSs show quite nontrivial behavior by the amplification schemes, depending on the amplitudes of coherent states, the number of coherent-state components, and the relative phases between the components. This implies that appropriate amplification schemes for SCSs should be chosen depending on the tasks and specific forms of the states. To investigate the quality of amplified states, we calculate the quantum Fisher information, a measure of quantum phase estimation. In terms of the quantum Fisher information, the <f:math xmlns:f="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><f:mrow><f:mover accent="true"><f:mi>a</f:mi><f:mo>̂</f:mo></f:mover><f:msup><f:mover accent="true"><f:mi>a</f:mi><f:mo>̂</f:mo></f:mover><f:mo>†</f:mo></f:msup></f:mrow></f:math> scheme tends to show better performance for relatively small amplitudes (<i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><i:mrow><i:mi>α</i:mi><i:mo>≲</i:mo><i:mn>0.9</i:mn></i:mrow></i:math>), while the <j:math xmlns:j="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><j:mrow><j:msup><j:mover accent="true"><j:mi>a</j:mi><j:mo>̂</j:mo></j:mover><j:mo>†</j:mo></j:msup><j:msup><j:mrow/><j:mn>2</j:mn></j:msup></j:mrow></j:math> scheme is better in the larger amplitude regime. The performance of the two schemes becomes indistinguishable as the amplitude grows sufficiently large.

Physical review. A/Physical review, AVol. 111(5)
Seoul National University (KR)
National Research Foundation, Seoul National University, National Research Foundation of Korea, Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Institute for Information and Communications Technology Promotion
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Quantum Information and Cryptography
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.