Idarubicin versus Epirubicin in Transarterial Chemoembolization for Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Stage B Hepatocellular Carcinoma: An Open-label, Randomized, Phase IV Trial

Background Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is regarded as the first-line treatment for patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage B hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the optimal chemotherapeutic agent loaded in TACE remains controversial. Purpose To compare the efficacy and safety of idarubicin and epirubicin as loaded drugs in drug-eluting bead (DEB)-TACE in patients with BCLC stage B HCC. Materials and Methods In this open-label, phase IV trial, patients with BCLC stage B HCC were recruited from four centers from August 2020 to October 2022 and randomly assigned (at a one-to-one ratio) to undergo idarubicin DEB-TACE or epirubicin DEB-TACE. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS), which was measured from the time of randomization to the time of progression or death from any cause. The efficacy analysis was conducted on an intention-to-treat basis, and only participants who received treatment were included in the safety analysis. Results A total of 239 participants (median age, 57 years; IQR, 50-66 years; 210 male) were randomly assigned to the idarubicin group (<i>n</i> = 120) or the epirubicin group (<i>n</i> = 119). The primary analysis cutoff for PFS was March 1, 2023, with 167 events observed (70%; idarubicin group, 85 events; epirubicin group, 82 events). The median PFS was 10.8 months and 8.7 months in the idarubicin and epirubicin groups, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 0.61; 95% CI: 0.44, 0.84; <i>P</i> = .002). The HR for median overall survival (OS) was 0.53 (95% CI: 0.31, 0.88), with OS rates of 81.5% and 77.3% at 12 months and 71.8% and 54.0% at 24 months for the idarubicin and epirubicin groups, respectively. The objective response rates were 70.8% and 57.1% for the idarubicin and epirubicin groups, respectively (<i>P</i> = .03). There was no evidence of a between-group difference in incidence of adverse events, including hematologic toxicity. No treatment-related deaths were observed. Conclusion Idarubicin DEB-TACE increased survival in participants with BCLC stage B HCC, without an increase in the incidence of any adverse events. Clinical trial registration no. ChiCTR2000034758 © RSNA, 2025 <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Radiology
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.242315
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.32

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Idarubicin versus Epirubicin in Transarterial Chemoembolization for Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Stage B Hepatocellular Carcinoma: An Open-label, Randomized, Phase IV Trial

Kun Huang, Liangliang Qiao, Jianwei Guo, Kangshou Liu et al.
1 citations
Radiology
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
1.32
article

Idarubicin versus Epirubicin in Transarterial Chemoembolization for Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Stage B Hepatocellular Carcinoma: An Open-label, Randomized, Phase IV Trial

Kun Huang, Liangliang Qiao, Jianwei Guo, Kangshou Liu, Jiaping Li, Yiyang Tang, Zhilong Liu, Yue Zhao, Bowen Zhu, Mingrong Cao, Wenzhe Fan, Haiqing Li, Junjie Liang, Jie Wen, Haikuan Liu, Yanqin Wu, Yang Jiang, Miao Xue
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is regarded as the first-line treatment for patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage B hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the optimal chemotherapeutic agent loaded in TACE remains controversial. Purpose To compare the efficacy and safety of idarubicin and epirubicin as loaded drugs in drug-eluting bead (DEB)-TACE in patients with BCLC stage B HCC. Materials and Methods In this open-label, phase IV trial, patients with BCLC stage B HCC were recruited from four centers from August 2020 to October 2022 and randomly assigned (at a one-to-one ratio) to undergo idarubicin DEB-TACE or epirubicin DEB-TACE. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS), which was measured from the time of randomization to the time of progression or death from any cause. The efficacy analysis was conducted on an intention-to-treat basis, and only participants who received treatment were included in the safety analysis. Results A total of 239 participants (median age, 57 years; IQR, 50-66 years; 210 male) were randomly assigned to the idarubicin group (<i>n</i> = 120) or the epirubicin group (<i>n</i> = 119). The primary analysis cutoff for PFS was March 1, 2023, with 167 events observed (70%; idarubicin group, 85 events; epirubicin group, 82 events). The median PFS was 10.8 months and 8.7 months in the idarubicin and epirubicin groups, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 0.61; 95% CI: 0.44, 0.84; <i>P</i> = .002). The HR for median overall survival (OS) was 0.53 (95% CI: 0.31, 0.88), with OS rates of 81.5% and 77.3% at 12 months and 71.8% and 54.0% at 24 months for the idarubicin and epirubicin groups, respectively. The objective response rates were 70.8% and 57.1% for the idarubicin and epirubicin groups, respectively (<i>P</i> = .03). There was no evidence of a between-group difference in incidence of adverse events, including hematologic toxicity. No treatment-related deaths were observed. Conclusion Idarubicin DEB-TACE increased survival in participants with BCLC stage B HCC, without an increase in the incidence of any adverse events. Clinical trial registration no. ChiCTR2000034758 © RSNA, 2025 <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i>

RadiologyVol. 315(2)
Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (CN), Sun Yat-sen University (CN), The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Taian City Central Hospital (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
1.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.