Global risk of wildfire across timber production systems
Timber is worth $1.5 trillion US Dollars annually with demand rising, but wildfires increasingly threaten production. Plantations occupy 3% of forests globally and produce 33% of the world's timber, but a critical question is whether they are more vulnerable to stand-replacing wildfires than natural production forests. We combine forest management and wildfire data to estimate that 15.7 (14.7-16.7) million hectares of natural production forests and 1.4 (1.26-1.64) million hectares of plantations suffered stand-replacing wildfires between 2015 and 2022. Using statistical matching for 17 countries representing 50% of global production and 75% of burned timber-producing forest, we find plantations in temperate regions were twice as likely to suffer stand-replacing wildfires than natural production forests, including in vital timber-producing nations like China and Russia. Plantations in tropical regions showed no clear effect, with national differences ranging from 75% lower to 58% higher risk of burning. Given increasing global reliance on plantation timber, preventing wildfires through landscape-level planning, fire management, and increased plantation diversity is critical for global wood security.
Authors
- Matthew G. Hethcoat (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5680-0635)
- David B. Lindenmayer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4766-4088)
- David P. Edwards (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8562-3853)
- Christopher G. Bousfield (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3576-9779)
- Oscar Morton (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5483-4498)
- Adam F. A. Pellegrini (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0418-4129)
Institutions
- Australian National University (AU)
- Canadian Forest Service (CA)
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Conservation Leadership Programme (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2025-05-06
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-59272-6
- Citations
- 5
- Primary Topic
- Fire effects on ecosystems
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 5.53
Funders
- Natural Environment Research Council