Using Laser-guided Variable-rate Spray Technology with Reduced Rates to Control Pests and Decrease Off-target Movement in a Tall Spindle-trained Apple Orchard

Apple orchardists in the United States protect their crops from numerous insects and diseases using foliar pesticide applications to produce blemish-free produce; however, doing so incurs significant labor and input costs. Variable-rate spray application technology used at the default spray rate has successfully reduced pesticide volume and, consequently, input costs in orchards and nurseries while effectively controlling several diseases and insects. Our objectives were to evaluate spray characteristics and the pest control efficacy of a sprayer operated in the variable-rate mode at a lower rate than the default rate and compare them with those associated with the conventional constant-rate spray mode. Through preliminary experiments, a reduced spray rate of 0.05 L·m −3 of crop volume, which equated to 321.1 L·ha −1 , was selected and compared with a conventional constant-rate of 808 L·ha −1 using a sprayer retrofitted with variable-rate spray technology and operated in the two different modes throughout two growing seasons. Foliage was scouted biweekly for diseases and two arthropods, and apples were scouted weekly for disease. The variable-rate mode reduced the pesticide volume applied by 58% and maintained pesticide coverage at or above the overspray threshold at all canopy locations except for one. Nontarget ground applications were greatly reduced using the variable-rate mode. Foliar disease measured as leaf spot incidence and leaf spot count severity was unaffected by the spray mode. Fruit rot incidence, fruit rot severity, and disease index for fruit were also unaffected by the spray mode. Fruit disease index, which incorporates both incidence and severity measurements, remained low throughout both seasons. Disease progression was assessed by calculating the area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC). The foliar AUDPC was significantly higher in the variable-rate treatment at the middle of hill location, but not at the bottom or the top of the hill, compared with that of the constant-rate treatment. The fruit AUDPC was unaffected by treatment. Although normally common in apple orchards, neither of the two arthropods was detected on any date. The utility and limitations of existing spray characterization metrics as well as the need for yet-to-be-developed metrics are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
HortScience
Published
2025-05-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21273/hortsci18464-25
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Plant Surface Properties and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.75

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using Laser-guided Variable-rate Spray Technology with Reduced Rates to Control Pests and Decrease Off-target Movement in a Tall Spindle-trained Apple Orchard

Amy Fulcher, Xiaocun Sun, Lauren Fessler Mathews, David Lockwood et al.
1 citations
HortScience
Plant Surface Properties and Treatments
1.75
article

Using Laser-guided Variable-rate Spray Technology with Reduced Rates to Control Pests and Decrease Off-target Movement in a Tall Spindle-trained Apple Orchard

Amy Fulcher, Xiaocun Sun, Lauren Fessler Mathews, David Lockwood, Wesley C. Wright, Heping Zhu, Zachariah R. Hansen, Karl McKim, Eleanor Phillips Lopez
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Apple orchardists in the United States protect their crops from numerous insects and diseases using foliar pesticide applications to produce blemish-free produce; however, doing so incurs significant labor and input costs. Variable-rate spray application technology used at the default spray rate has successfully reduced pesticide volume and, consequently, input costs in orchards and nurseries while effectively controlling several diseases and insects. Our objectives were to evaluate spray characteristics and the pest control efficacy of a sprayer operated in the variable-rate mode at a lower rate than the default rate and compare them with those associated with the conventional constant-rate spray mode. Through preliminary experiments, a reduced spray rate of 0.05 L·m −3 of crop volume, which equated to 321.1 L·ha −1 , was selected and compared with a conventional constant-rate of 808 L·ha −1 using a sprayer retrofitted with variable-rate spray technology and operated in the two different modes throughout two growing seasons. Foliage was scouted biweekly for diseases and two arthropods, and apples were scouted weekly for disease. The variable-rate mode reduced the pesticide volume applied by 58% and maintained pesticide coverage at or above the overspray threshold at all canopy locations except for one. Nontarget ground applications were greatly reduced using the variable-rate mode. Foliar disease measured as leaf spot incidence and leaf spot count severity was unaffected by the spray mode. Fruit rot incidence, fruit rot severity, and disease index for fruit were also unaffected by the spray mode. Fruit disease index, which incorporates both incidence and severity measurements, remained low throughout both seasons. Disease progression was assessed by calculating the area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC). The foliar AUDPC was significantly higher in the variable-rate treatment at the middle of hill location, but not at the bottom or the top of the hill, compared with that of the constant-rate treatment. The fruit AUDPC was unaffected by treatment. Although normally common in apple orchards, neither of the two arthropods was detected on any date. The utility and limitations of existing spray characterization metrics as well as the need for yet-to-be-developed metrics are discussed.

HortScienceVol. 60(6)
United States Department of Agriculture (US), University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Plant Surface Properties and Treatments
1.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.