Numerical Modeling of Stress-State Dependent Damage Evolution and Ductile Fracture of Austenitic Stainless Steel

In this study, a stress-state-dependent elastoplastic-damage coupled constitutive model was developed and implemented into a commercial FEA program to predict the plastic behavior and fracture of 304L stainless steel. Damage evolution was experimentally quantified using unloading–reloading tensile tests, and Bonora’s damage model was applied to describe this evolution. The uncoupled damage model accurately captured the force–displacement response of smooth tensile specimens but exhibited up to an 8 % discrepancy in predicting the maximum load for notched specimens. In contrast, the coupled damage model, which accounted for stress triaxiality-dependent damage evolution, reduced this discrepancy to just 1.8 %. This study demonstrates that 304L stainless steel sheets exhibit a true stress–strain relationship that depends on stress triaxiality, and disregarding this factor can lead to notable differences in fracture predictions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Solids and Structures
Published
2025-05-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2025.113439
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Metal Forming Simulation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.14

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Numerical Modeling of Stress-State Dependent Damage Evolution and Ductile Fracture of Austenitic Stainless Steel

Myung-Sung Kim, Hwa-Sup Jang, You-Hee Cho
3 citations
International Journal of Solids and Structures
Metal Forming Simulation Techniques
2.14
article

Numerical Modeling of Stress-State Dependent Damage Evolution and Ductile Fracture of Austenitic Stainless Steel

Myung-Sung Kim, Hwa-Sup Jang, You-Hee Cho
article en
3 citations

Abstract

In this study, a stress-state-dependent elastoplastic-damage coupled constitutive model was developed and implemented into a commercial FEA program to predict the plastic behavior and fracture of 304L stainless steel. Damage evolution was experimentally quantified using unloading–reloading tensile tests, and Bonora’s damage model was applied to describe this evolution. The uncoupled damage model accurately captured the force–displacement response of smooth tensile specimens but exhibited up to an 8 % discrepancy in predicting the maximum load for notched specimens. In contrast, the coupled damage model, which accounted for stress triaxiality-dependent damage evolution, reduced this discrepancy to just 1.8 %. This study demonstrates that 304L stainless steel sheets exhibit a true stress–strain relationship that depends on stress triaxiality, and disregarding this factor can lead to notable differences in fracture predictions.

International Journal of Solids and StructuresVol. 318
Korean Register (South Korea) (KR), Korea Institute of Machinery & Materials (KR)
Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Metal Forming Simulation Techniques
2.14
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Numerical Modeling of Stress-State Dependent Damage Evolution and Ductile Fracture of Austenitic Stainless Steel — Myung-Sung Kim, Hwa-Sup Jang, et al. · International Journal of Solids and Structures (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS