Market Access Regulations for Foreign Investment in Cross-border E-commerce: A Comparative Study Between China and Malaysia<b></b>

This study conducts a systematic comparative analysis of market access regulations for foreign investment in cross-border e-commerce between China and Malaysia. Drawing on current regulatory frameworks and implementation practices, the research identifies significant patterns of convergence and divergence in how these two countries regulate foreign participation in their digital economies. Malaysia has adopted a relatively open framework characterized by streamlined registration procedures, liberal foreign equity policies, and transparent enforcement mechanisms, positioning itself as a gateway to ASEAN markets. In contrast, China maintains a more complex regime with multi-layered approval requirements, significant sectoral restrictions, and interventionist enforcement practices, reflecting its emphasis on digital sovereignty and state-directed economic development. The research highlights specialized economic zones—Malaysia's Digital Free Trade Zone and China's Cross-Border E-Commerce Pilot Zones—as key instruments of regulatory innovation in both countries. Case studies of Chinese e-commerce platforms entering Malaysia and Malaysian digital businesses entering China reveal asymmetric market access conditions with practical implications for investors. This comparative analysis contributes to our understanding of how different legal traditions and regulatory philosophies shape digital economy governance, while offering strategic insights for investors navigating these complex regulatory environments and policymakers seeking greater harmonization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Asia Social Science Practice
Published
2025-05-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71411/jassp.2025.33
Citations
2
Primary Topic
E-commerce and Technology Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.89
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Market Access Regulations for Foreign Investment in Cross-border E-commerce: A Comparative Study Between China and Malaysia

XIAOTIAN CUI, Kemeng Wang, Haoyu Zhao
2 citations
Journal of Asia Social Science Practice
E-commerce and Technology Innovations
4.89
article

Market Access Regulations for Foreign Investment in Cross-border E-commerce: A Comparative Study Between China and Malaysia

XIAOTIAN CUI, Kemeng Wang, Haoyu Zhao
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study conducts a systematic comparative analysis of market access regulations for foreign investment in cross-border e-commerce between China and Malaysia. Drawing on current regulatory frameworks and implementation practices, the research identifies significant patterns of convergence and divergence in how these two countries regulate foreign participation in their digital economies. Malaysia has adopted a relatively open framework characterized by streamlined registration procedures, liberal foreign equity policies, and transparent enforcement mechanisms, positioning itself as a gateway to ASEAN markets. In contrast, China maintains a more complex regime with multi-layered approval requirements, significant sectoral restrictions, and interventionist enforcement practices, reflecting its emphasis on digital sovereignty and state-directed economic development. The research highlights specialized economic zones—Malaysia's Digital Free Trade Zone and China's Cross-Border E-Commerce Pilot Zones—as key instruments of regulatory innovation in both countries. Case studies of Chinese e-commerce platforms entering Malaysia and Malaysian digital businesses entering China reveal asymmetric market access conditions with practical implications for investors. This comparative analysis contributes to our understanding of how different legal traditions and regulatory philosophies shape digital economy governance, while offering strategic insights for investors navigating these complex regulatory environments and policymakers seeking greater harmonization.

Journal of Asia Social Science PracticeVol. 2(1)
University of Malaya (MY), Futures in Rehabilitation Management (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
E-commerce and Technology Innovations
4.89
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.