In generative artificial intelligence we trust: unpacking determinants and outcomes for cognitive trust

Abstract Amid the pervasive integration of AI technologies across societal and industrial domains, understanding users’ trust in these systems becomes increasingly crucial. This study addresses the growing need to understand users’ trust in Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) and explores the societal implications of this type of trust. Based on the socio-technical systems theory, this work employs the FAT (Fairness, Accountability, Transparency) framework and humanness factors of AI, anthropomorphism, social presence, and emotions, as antecedents of users’ human-like trust, which is proposed to influence users’ attitudes, perceived performance, and behavioral intentions. Structural equation modeling analysis ( N = 244) reveals that fairness significantly enhances trust, while accountability and transparency do not. Social presence and emotions positively impact trust, whereas anthropomorphism shows no significant effect. Furthermore, trust shapes users’ attitudes, perceived performance, and behavioral intentions toward GenAI systems. This study contributes to the AI adoption and user trust literature by illuminating the main antecedents of human-like trust and showing its impact on user acceptance from a social-technical perspective. Beyond the academic contribution, this research highlights the broader societal relevance of user trust in GenAI, particularly regarding public concerns over black box issues and humanness features of GenAI systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AI & Society
Published
2025-05-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02378-8
Citations
20
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
49.62

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

In generative artificial intelligence we trust: unpacking determinants and outcomes for cognitive trust

Thomas Aichner, Minh-Tay Huynh
20 citations
AI & Society
AI in Service Interactions
49.62
article

In generative artificial intelligence we trust: unpacking determinants and outcomes for cognitive trust

Thomas Aichner, Minh-Tay Huynh
article en
20 citations

Abstract

Abstract Amid the pervasive integration of AI technologies across societal and industrial domains, understanding users’ trust in these systems becomes increasingly crucial. This study addresses the growing need to understand users’ trust in Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) and explores the societal implications of this type of trust. Based on the socio-technical systems theory, this work employs the FAT (Fairness, Accountability, Transparency) framework and humanness factors of AI, anthropomorphism, social presence, and emotions, as antecedents of users’ human-like trust, which is proposed to influence users’ attitudes, perceived performance, and behavioral intentions. Structural equation modeling analysis ( N = 244) reveals that fairness significantly enhances trust, while accountability and transparency do not. Social presence and emotions positively impact trust, whereas anthropomorphism shows no significant effect. Furthermore, trust shapes users’ attitudes, perceived performance, and behavioral intentions toward GenAI systems. This study contributes to the AI adoption and user trust literature by illuminating the main antecedents of human-like trust and showing its impact on user acceptance from a social-technical perspective. Beyond the academic contribution, this research highlights the broader societal relevance of user trust in GenAI, particularly regarding public concerns over black box issues and humanness features of GenAI systems.

AI & SocietyVol. 40(8)
Free University of Bozen-Bolzano (IT)
Libera Università di Bolzano
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
AI in Service Interactions
49.62
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.