Before, During, and After Gender

What would a nonessentialist history of gender look like? In this paper, we suggest that mainstream gender history, archaeology, and related disciplines have inadvertently black boxed some of the most interesting questions about what past gender may have been like. Traditional Eurocentric approaches treat gender as variable but only within certain predefined limits; they do not radically question what happens if we shift the term definitionally. This constrains both the stories we can tell about gender and the questions we can ask about it. In contrast, we draw upon feminist conceptions of difference to offer alternative histories ranging from where and how gender may have first emerged to its transitions in Europe over the last 7,000 years. Assumptions about gender in Europe have played an outsized role in mainstream and hegemonic accounts. By problematizing how gender emerged and changed in Europe, we can help decenter this narrative. Drawing on notions of protean difference, this reconceptualizes gender as a form of identity that is not automatically applicable to all human societies and has a specific history and, potentially, a shelf life.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Current Anthropology
Published
2025-05-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/735735
Primary Topic
Anthropological Studies and Insights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Before, During, and After Gender

John Robb, Oliver J. T. Harris
Current Anthropology
Anthropological Studies and Insights
article

Before, During, and After Gender

John Robb, Oliver J. T. Harris
article en

Abstract

What would a nonessentialist history of gender look like? In this paper, we suggest that mainstream gender history, archaeology, and related disciplines have inadvertently black boxed some of the most interesting questions about what past gender may have been like. Traditional Eurocentric approaches treat gender as variable but only within certain predefined limits; they do not radically question what happens if we shift the term definitionally. This constrains both the stories we can tell about gender and the questions we can ask about it. In contrast, we draw upon feminist conceptions of difference to offer alternative histories ranging from where and how gender may have first emerged to its transitions in Europe over the last 7,000 years. Assumptions about gender in Europe have played an outsized role in mainstream and hegemonic accounts. By problematizing how gender emerged and changed in Europe, we can help decenter this narrative. Drawing on notions of protean difference, this reconceptualizes gender as a form of identity that is not automatically applicable to all human societies and has a specific history and, potentially, a shelf life.

Current AnthropologyVol. 66(3)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Anthropological Studies and Insights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Before, During, and After Gender — John Robb, Oliver J. T. Harris · Current Anthropology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS