Cervical disc replacement in athletes: a modified Delphi Consensus Survey of expert opinion

Consensus was achieved that CDR is an acceptable treatment for radiculopathy (74%) but not myelopathy (47%) in high impact/high frequency athletes; however, only 59% of surgeons would offer a CDR for athletes with radiculopathy. Reasons for CDR hesitancy were certainty of outcomes with ACDF, safety concerns, and lack of long-term data. Although consensus was reached for some indications herein, this study highlights the ongoing heterogeneity in the use of CDR for contact sport athletes and concerns regarding its safety. Future research should focus on gathering primary data on safety, durability, and long-term efficacy of CDR among athletes of different sports.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Spine Journal
Published
2025-05-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2025.05.009
Primary Topic
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cervical disc replacement in athletes: a modified Delphi Consensus Survey of expert opinion

Robert G. Watkins, Susan Liew, Steven C. Ludwig, Andrew M. Cordover et al.
The Spine Journal
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
article

Cervical disc replacement in athletes: a modified Delphi Consensus Survey of expert opinion

Robert G. Watkins, Susan Liew, Steven C. Ludwig, Andrew M. Cordover, David O. Okonkwo, Ronald A. Lehman, Robert C. Cantu, Hank Feuer, Scott L. Zuckerman, Vincent Mièle, Frank M. Phillips, Gavin A Davis, Venu M. Nemani, Jacob Joseph, Raymond Joseph Gardocki, Nicholas Theodore, Allan D. Levi, Jacob Jo, Gabriel A. Smith, Domagoj Coric, K. Daniel Riew, Sheeraz A. Qureshi, Philip K. Louie, Andrew C. Hecht, Christopher M. Bonfield, Philip V Chan, Wellington K. Hsu, Grant H. Rigney, Jeffrey P. Mullin, Jay D. Turner, Rick C. Sasso, Alexander R. Vaccaro, Joseph C. Maroon, Allen K. Sills, Julian E. Bailes, Myron A. Rogers
article en

Abstract

Consensus was achieved that CDR is an acceptable treatment for radiculopathy (74%) but not myelopathy (47%) in high impact/high frequency athletes; however, only 59% of surgeons would offer a CDR for athletes with radiculopathy. Reasons for CDR hesitancy were certainty of outcomes with ACDF, safety concerns, and lack of long-term data. Although consensus was reached for some indications herein, this study highlights the ongoing heterogeneity in the use of CDR for contact sport athletes and concerns regarding its safety. Future research should focus on gathering primary data on safety, durability, and long-term efficacy of CDR among athletes of different sports.

The Spine JournalVol. 25(12)
Northwestern University (US), University of Maryland, Baltimore (US), Hospital for Special Surgery (US), Rush University Medical Center (US), American Sports Medicine Institute (US), University of Maryland Medical Center (US), Virginia Mason Medical Center (US), Mount Sinai Health System (US), Barrow Neurological Institute (US), NorthShore University HealthSystem (US), NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital (US), Harvard University (US), University of Miami (US), Cornell University (US), University of Michigan (US), University Hospitals of Cleveland (US), Franciscan Health (US), Austin Hospital (AU), Emerson Hospital (US), Marina Del Rey Hospital (US), The Alfred Hospital (AU), University of Chicago (US), Cabrini Hospital (AU), Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research centre (AU), Atrium Medical Cente (US), Center for Neurosciences (US), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US), Rothman Institute (US), Johns Hopkins Hospital (US), University School (US), Neurological Surgery (US), Alfred Health (AU), Austin Health (AU), Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US), Monash University (AU), Case Western Reserve University (US), University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US), Columbia University (US), Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.