Does competitive pressure drive effective corporate environmental actions?

Competitive pressure is an important driving factor of corporate behavioural changes. Yet, it is still unclear how it influences corporate attitudes towards environmental challenges. In this study, we systematically analyse the sustainability behaviour of a global sample of publicly traded firms to examine if and how competitive pressure pushes them to implement effective behavioural changes to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions. Our results suggest that competitive pressure induces firms to diversify investments across a broad spectrum of environmental initiatives. Importantly, diversification results from a decreased relative investment in risk mitigation and stakeholder engagement activities counterbalanced by an increased relative investment in innovation capabilities, and it is associated with a positive abatement potential. Effects are modest in size but significant and robust against multiple alternative specifications. Overall, our analysis suggests that competitive pressures can be a driving force of effective corporate mitigation actions that integrate response diversity mechanisms to environmental challenges. • We investigate how companies respond to competitive pressure and the extent to which their empirical response mechanisms are associated with measurable emissions abatement. • Competitive pressure induces firms to diversify their investments in environmental activities across a broad range of action and goals. • Diversification of environmental actions is associated with lower future emissions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cleaner Production
Published
2025-05-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145585
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Environmental Sustainability in Business
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.22
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does competitive pressure drive effective corporate environmental actions?

Maurizio Zollo, Marek Rei, Hossein Asgharian, Simone Cenci et al.
3 citations
Journal of Cleaner Production
Environmental Sustainability in Business
6.22
article

Does competitive pressure drive effective corporate environmental actions?

Maurizio Zollo, Marek Rei, Hossein Asgharian, Simone Cenci, Lu Liu
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Competitive pressure is an important driving factor of corporate behavioural changes. Yet, it is still unclear how it influences corporate attitudes towards environmental challenges. In this study, we systematically analyse the sustainability behaviour of a global sample of publicly traded firms to examine if and how competitive pressure pushes them to implement effective behavioural changes to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions. Our results suggest that competitive pressure induces firms to diversify investments across a broad spectrum of environmental initiatives. Importantly, diversification results from a decreased relative investment in risk mitigation and stakeholder engagement activities counterbalanced by an increased relative investment in innovation capabilities, and it is associated with a positive abatement potential. Effects are modest in size but significant and robust against multiple alternative specifications. Overall, our analysis suggests that competitive pressures can be a driving force of effective corporate mitigation actions that integrate response diversity mechanisms to environmental challenges. • We investigate how companies respond to competitive pressure and the extent to which their empirical response mechanisms are associated with measurable emissions abatement. • Competitive pressure induces firms to diversify their investments in environmental activities across a broad range of action and goals. • Diversification of environmental actions is associated with lower future emissions.

Journal of Cleaner ProductionVol. 511
Stockholm University (SE), Lund University (SE), Centre for Sustainable Energy (GB), Leonardo (United Kingdom) (GB), University College London (GB), Imperial College London (GB)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Environmental Sustainability in Business
6.22
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.