Framing sustainability in CEOs’ letters

Abstract In recent years, the aviation industry has transformed its approach to carbon emissions disclosures due to public scrutiny and regulatory pressures. This study analyzes letters from CEOs of selected airlines in 2019 and 2021, employing appraisal theory to explore shifts in messaging strategies. The analysis reveals that while 2019 communications emphasized economic considerations, by 2021, a more ethical approach emerged, with increased use of terms like “sustainability”, “concern”, and “regulation”. This shift reflects a growing awareness of moral responsibility regarding environmental impact. However, the focus on ethical language raises questions about clarity and accessibility for stakeholders. Organizations must prioritize transparent, relevant communication to build trust, as vague language can foster skepticism about corporate commitments, highlighting the need for balanced, objective reporting in sustainability efforts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Language and Dialogue
Published
2025-05-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00197.pop
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Management and Organizational Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.76
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Framing sustainability in CEOs’ letters

Franca Poppi
1 citations
Language and Dialogue
Management and Organizational Studies
2.76
article

Framing sustainability in CEOs’ letters

Franca Poppi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract In recent years, the aviation industry has transformed its approach to carbon emissions disclosures due to public scrutiny and regulatory pressures. This study analyzes letters from CEOs of selected airlines in 2019 and 2021, employing appraisal theory to explore shifts in messaging strategies. The analysis reveals that while 2019 communications emphasized economic considerations, by 2021, a more ethical approach emerged, with increased use of terms like “sustainability”, “concern”, and “regulation”. This shift reflects a growing awareness of moral responsibility regarding environmental impact. However, the focus on ethical language raises questions about clarity and accessibility for stakeholders. Organizations must prioritize transparent, relevant communication to build trust, as vague language can foster skepticism about corporate commitments, highlighting the need for balanced, objective reporting in sustainability efforts.

Language and DialogueVol. 15(2)
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT), University of Münster (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Management and Organizational Studies
2.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.