When do clouds and aerosols lead to higher canopy photosynthesis?

• Unexplained variation in canopy photosynthesis calls for a revised approach. • New guidelines enable consistent quantification of the diffuse fertilization effect. • First observation of how cloud type influences photosynthesis enhancement. • Aerosols and thin clouds enhance photosynthesis more frequently than thick clouds. • Site characteristics modulate photosynthesis enhancement at multiple scales. Clouds and aerosols can increase canopy photosynthesis relative to clear-sky values through changes in total and diffuse solar radiation: the diffuse fertilization effect (DFE). DFE varies across observational sites due to (a) inconsistent definitions and quantifications of DFE, (b) unexplored relationships between DFE and cloudiness type, and (c) insufficient knowledge of the effect of site characteristics. We showed that: DFE definitions vary, DFE quantifications do not connect to existing definitions or do not isolate the causal factor, and a systematic protocol to quantify DFE is lacking. A new theoretical framework served to clarify the relation between DFE definitions, and showed how DFE varies with cloudiness types and site characteristics. We proposed guidelines for a systematic DFE quantification across studies, and which aim to isolate the causal factor of DFE. Applying our framework to observations of canopy photosynthesis, solar radiation and cloudiness types we quantified DFE at daily and sub-daily time scales. We showed for the first time how DFE varies with cloudiness type, due to the varying trade-off between diffuse radiation and total solar radiation. Using an observation-driven canopy photosynthesis model, we showed that the DFE varies with site characteristics and time of day. The DFE responded strongly to leaf area index, canopy nitrogen distribution, leaf orientation and leaf transmittance, with leaf area index and leaf orientation driving DFE occurrences at our site. Our study emphasizes the importance of quantifying the DFE systematically and accurately across observational sites and highlights the need for information on cloudiness climatology and site characteristics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
Published
2025-05-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2025.110597
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.42

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When do clouds and aerosols lead to higher canopy photosynthesis?

A.F. Moene, Oscar Hartogensis, Jordi Vilà-Guerau De Arellano, Kevin Van Diepen et al.
4 citations
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
4.42
article

When do clouds and aerosols lead to higher canopy photosynthesis?

A.F. Moene, Oscar Hartogensis, Jordi Vilà-Guerau De Arellano, Kevin Van Diepen, Elias Kaiser, Alexander Graf
article en
4 citations

Abstract

• Unexplained variation in canopy photosynthesis calls for a revised approach. • New guidelines enable consistent quantification of the diffuse fertilization effect. • First observation of how cloud type influences photosynthesis enhancement. • Aerosols and thin clouds enhance photosynthesis more frequently than thick clouds. • Site characteristics modulate photosynthesis enhancement at multiple scales. Clouds and aerosols can increase canopy photosynthesis relative to clear-sky values through changes in total and diffuse solar radiation: the diffuse fertilization effect (DFE). DFE varies across observational sites due to (a) inconsistent definitions and quantifications of DFE, (b) unexplored relationships between DFE and cloudiness type, and (c) insufficient knowledge of the effect of site characteristics. We showed that: DFE definitions vary, DFE quantifications do not connect to existing definitions or do not isolate the causal factor, and a systematic protocol to quantify DFE is lacking. A new theoretical framework served to clarify the relation between DFE definitions, and showed how DFE varies with cloudiness types and site characteristics. We proposed guidelines for a systematic DFE quantification across studies, and which aim to isolate the causal factor of DFE. Applying our framework to observations of canopy photosynthesis, solar radiation and cloudiness types we quantified DFE at daily and sub-daily time scales. We showed for the first time how DFE varies with cloudiness type, due to the varying trade-off between diffuse radiation and total solar radiation. Using an observation-driven canopy photosynthesis model, we showed that the DFE varies with site characteristics and time of day. The DFE responded strongly to leaf area index, canopy nitrogen distribution, leaf orientation and leaf transmittance, with leaf area index and leaf orientation driving DFE occurrences at our site. Our study emphasizes the importance of quantifying the DFE systematically and accurately across observational sites and highlights the need for information on cloudiness climatology and site characteristics.

Agricultural and Forest MeteorologyVol. 370
Forschungszentrum Jülich (DE), Max Planck Institute for Chemistry (DE), Sphere Institute (US), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Wageningen University and Research Centre
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
4.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.