CRISPR genome editing using a combined positive and negative selection system

The clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/Cas system is a powerful genome editing tool that has revolutionized research. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are the most common form of genetic variation in humans. Only a subset of these SNPs has been shown to be linked to genetic diseases, while the biological relevance of the majority remains unclear. Investigating these variants of unknown significance could provide valuable insights into their roles in biological processes, disease susceptibility, and treatment responses. While CRISPR/Cas has emerged as a transformative technology, its ability to make single nucleotide substitutions remains a significant limitation. Other techniques in single nucleotide editing, such as base editing and prime editing, offer promising possibilities to complement CRISPR/Cas systems, though they also have their own limitations. Hence, alternative approaches are necessary to overcome the limitations of CRISPR. Here, to improve the feasibility of generating single base edits in the genome, we provide a protocol that introduces a multiple expression and dual selection (MEDS) system, which, alongside CRISPR, utilizes the opposing roles of cytosine deaminase/uracil phosphoribosyltransferase (CD/UPRT) for negative selection and neomycin phosphotransferase II (NPT II) for positive selection. As a proof of concept and to demonstrate feasibility of the method, we used MEDS, along with traditional CRISPR-Cas9, to generate sickle hemoglobin by introducing a point mutation (A → T) in the sixth codon of the hemoglobin beta gene.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-05-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0321881
Citations
1
Primary Topic
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.81

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CRISPR genome editing using a combined positive and negative selection system

Kelly Hall, Shannon Moonah, Ishrya Sharma
1 citations
PLoS ONE
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
0.81
article

CRISPR genome editing using a combined positive and negative selection system

Kelly Hall, Shannon Moonah, Ishrya Sharma
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/Cas system is a powerful genome editing tool that has revolutionized research. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are the most common form of genetic variation in humans. Only a subset of these SNPs has been shown to be linked to genetic diseases, while the biological relevance of the majority remains unclear. Investigating these variants of unknown significance could provide valuable insights into their roles in biological processes, disease susceptibility, and treatment responses. While CRISPR/Cas has emerged as a transformative technology, its ability to make single nucleotide substitutions remains a significant limitation. Other techniques in single nucleotide editing, such as base editing and prime editing, offer promising possibilities to complement CRISPR/Cas systems, though they also have their own limitations. Hence, alternative approaches are necessary to overcome the limitations of CRISPR. Here, to improve the feasibility of generating single base edits in the genome, we provide a protocol that introduces a multiple expression and dual selection (MEDS) system, which, alongside CRISPR, utilizes the opposing roles of cytosine deaminase/uracil phosphoribosyltransferase (CD/UPRT) for negative selection and neomycin phosphotransferase II (NPT II) for positive selection. As a proof of concept and to demonstrate feasibility of the method, we used MEDS, along with traditional CRISPR-Cas9, to generate sickle hemoglobin by introducing a point mutation (A → T) in the sixth codon of the hemoglobin beta gene.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(5)
University of Florida (US), University Press of Florida (US)
Hartwell Foundation, National Institutes of Health
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
0.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

CRISPR genome editing using a combined positive and negative selection system — Kelly Hall, Shannon Moonah, et al. · PLoS ONE (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS