Variation of eGFR Wait Time Modifications for Black Kidney Transplant Candidates in the United States

Key Points In 2023, national policy mandated that kidney transplant centers identify Black candidates for potential waitlist priority modification. Overall, 32% of Black candidates received modification with significant variation by candidate characteristics and transplant center. Candidates who received modification had close to three-fold higher rates of deceased donor transplantation. Background In 2023, kidney transplant programs in the United States were mandated by the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) to identify all Black candidates on their kidney waiting lists and evaluate potential modifications of waiting time. This mandate was the result of established differences in eligibility for candidates to receive priority for donor offers based on race-neutral and race-inclusive eGFR. The policy went into effect on January 5, 2023, and required submission of appropriate modifications with a deadline of January 3, 2024. Methods We included OPTN data for adult Black candidates on the kidney and kidney/pancreas transplant waiting lists in the United States between January 6, 2023, and December 31, 2023. We evaluated incidence of wait time modifications based on eGFR, characterized candidates with and without modifications, heterogeneity in center-level implementation of eGFR modifications, and the association of modification with time to deceased donor transplantation using multivariable generalized estimating equations and Cox models. Results Overall, 32% (14,419/44,912) of Black candidate listings received an eGFR modification of waiting time priority. In multivariable analysis, candidates with modifications were older (compared with candidates aged 18–49, ages 65–69 and 70+ had adjusted odds ratio [aOR]=1.60 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.49 to 1.72] and 1.52 [95% CI, 1.40 to 1.66] respectively), female (aOR=1.09, 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.14), and preemptively placed on the waiting list (aOR=2.58, 95% CI, 2.46 to 2.72). Kidney-alone candidates (versus kidney-pancreas candidates), candidates with higher body mass index, and prior transplant recipients also had higher adjusted likelihood of waiting time modification. The median increase in qualifying priority days for candidates was 610 (interquartile range=330–1049). Waitlist modification was associated with a significantly higher rate of deceased donor transplantation (adjusted hazard ratio=2.85 [95% CI, 2.70 to 3.02]). There was significant variation by transplant center in the proportion of prevalent patients with modifications (median=31%, interquartile range=11%–45%). Conclusions There was significant patient- and center-level variation in the implementation of eGFR modifications and a higher rate of transplantation for candidates who received modifications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2025-05-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.0000000734
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.97
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Variation of eGFR Wait Time Modifications for Black Kidney Transplant Candidates in the United States

Miko Yu, Susana Arrigain, Jesse D. Schold, Deena Brosi et al.
2 citations
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
3.97
article

Variation of eGFR Wait Time Modifications for Black Kidney Transplant Candidates in the United States

Miko Yu, Susana Arrigain, Jesse D. Schold, Deena Brosi, Sumit Mohan, Syed Ali Husain, Rocío López, R. LaVanchy
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Key Points In 2023, national policy mandated that kidney transplant centers identify Black candidates for potential waitlist priority modification. Overall, 32% of Black candidates received modification with significant variation by candidate characteristics and transplant center. Candidates who received modification had close to three-fold higher rates of deceased donor transplantation. Background In 2023, kidney transplant programs in the United States were mandated by the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) to identify all Black candidates on their kidney waiting lists and evaluate potential modifications of waiting time. This mandate was the result of established differences in eligibility for candidates to receive priority for donor offers based on race-neutral and race-inclusive eGFR. The policy went into effect on January 5, 2023, and required submission of appropriate modifications with a deadline of January 3, 2024. Methods We included OPTN data for adult Black candidates on the kidney and kidney/pancreas transplant waiting lists in the United States between January 6, 2023, and December 31, 2023. We evaluated incidence of wait time modifications based on eGFR, characterized candidates with and without modifications, heterogeneity in center-level implementation of eGFR modifications, and the association of modification with time to deceased donor transplantation using multivariable generalized estimating equations and Cox models. Results Overall, 32% (14,419/44,912) of Black candidate listings received an eGFR modification of waiting time priority. In multivariable analysis, candidates with modifications were older (compared with candidates aged 18–49, ages 65–69 and 70+ had adjusted odds ratio [aOR]=1.60 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.49 to 1.72] and 1.52 [95% CI, 1.40 to 1.66] respectively), female (aOR=1.09, 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.14), and preemptively placed on the waiting list (aOR=2.58, 95% CI, 2.46 to 2.72). Kidney-alone candidates (versus kidney-pancreas candidates), candidates with higher body mass index, and prior transplant recipients also had higher adjusted likelihood of waiting time modification. The median increase in qualifying priority days for candidates was 610 (interquartile range=330–1049). Waitlist modification was associated with a significantly higher rate of deceased donor transplantation (adjusted hazard ratio=2.85 [95% CI, 2.70 to 3.02]). There was significant variation by transplant center in the proportion of prevalent patients with modifications (median=31%, interquartile range=11%–45%). Conclusions There was significant patient- and center-level variation in the implementation of eGFR modifications and a higher rate of transplantation for candidates who received modifications.

Journal of the American Society of NephrologyVol. 36(10)
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (US), Columbia University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
3.97
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.