Revealing the impact of operational constraints on aerodynamic collision avoidance maneuvers: In-flight results from the BEESAT-4 CubeSat

Effective collision avoidance strategies will play a central role in the future in order to take account of the rapidly increasing number of satellites in Low Earth Orbit and the associated increase in collision probabilities. For small, lightweight satellites (e.g. CubeSats), propellantless options represent a highly attractive solution. A targeted change in the satellite’s ballistic coefficient alters the drag experienced and thus provides a way to actively adjust the satellite’s trajectory, e.g. to avoid an imminent collision. Despite extensive theoretical progress in this field, no in-orbit demonstrations of propellantless collision avoidance have been carried out to date. Thus, there exists a lack of experience on how potential operational limitations affect the theoretical considerations. To bridge the gap, a collaborative effort between the Julius-Maximilian Universität Würzburg, the Technische Universität Berlin, and the Universität Stuttgart has been initiated. This article presents the results of a joint study utilizing BEESAT-4, a conventional 1U CubeSat operated by the Technische Universität Berlin and launched into a 500 km Sun-synchronous orbit in June 2016. The study investigates how operational constraints impact the feasibility of maneuver sequences. To achieve this research objective, the impact of operational constraints on the effectiveness of orbital drag manipulation was evaluated. The analysis reveals that a consideration of the operational constraints reduces the maneuver effectiveness of an aerodynamically controlled collision avoidance maneuver for the BEESAT-4 satellite by almost 90 %. The reduction is revealed via theoretical considerations as well as an analysis of the in-orbit flight data conducted by OKAPI:Orbits GmbH. Overall, the findings are intended to enhance the practical deployment of sophisticated aerodynamic maneuvers in orbit, benefiting both the academic community and broader aerospace applications. • Propellant-less collision avoidance maneuver via aerodynamic drag. • In-orbit flight campaigns for BEESAT-4 (1U CubeSat). • Quantification of the impact of operational constraints on the maneuver efficiency. • Improving the practical feasibility of demanding maneuvers in orbit. • Consideration and optimization of satellite operations for propellant-less orbit control.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Astronautica
Published
2025-05-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2025.04.038
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Space Satellite Systems and Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
29.96
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revealing the impact of operational constraints on aerodynamic collision avoidance maneuvers: In-flight results from the BEESAT-4 CubeSat

Fabrizio Turco, Mohamed Khalil Ben‐Larbi, Daniel Lück, Enrico Stoll et al.
6 citations
Acta Astronautica
Space Satellite Systems and Control
29.96
article

Revealing the impact of operational constraints on aerodynamic collision avoidance maneuvers: In-flight results from the BEESAT-4 CubeSat

Fabrizio Turco, Mohamed Khalil Ben‐Larbi, Daniel Lück, Enrico Stoll, Constantin Traub, Anton Johann Große Siestrup, Julian Harbeck
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Effective collision avoidance strategies will play a central role in the future in order to take account of the rapidly increasing number of satellites in Low Earth Orbit and the associated increase in collision probabilities. For small, lightweight satellites (e.g. CubeSats), propellantless options represent a highly attractive solution. A targeted change in the satellite’s ballistic coefficient alters the drag experienced and thus provides a way to actively adjust the satellite’s trajectory, e.g. to avoid an imminent collision. Despite extensive theoretical progress in this field, no in-orbit demonstrations of propellantless collision avoidance have been carried out to date. Thus, there exists a lack of experience on how potential operational limitations affect the theoretical considerations. To bridge the gap, a collaborative effort between the Julius-Maximilian Universität Würzburg, the Technische Universität Berlin, and the Universität Stuttgart has been initiated. This article presents the results of a joint study utilizing BEESAT-4, a conventional 1U CubeSat operated by the Technische Universität Berlin and launched into a 500 km Sun-synchronous orbit in June 2016. The study investigates how operational constraints impact the feasibility of maneuver sequences. To achieve this research objective, the impact of operational constraints on the effectiveness of orbital drag manipulation was evaluated. The analysis reveals that a consideration of the operational constraints reduces the maneuver effectiveness of an aerodynamically controlled collision avoidance maneuver for the BEESAT-4 satellite by almost 90 %. The reduction is revealed via theoretical considerations as well as an analysis of the in-orbit flight data conducted by OKAPI:Orbits GmbH. Overall, the findings are intended to enhance the practical deployment of sophisticated aerodynamic maneuvers in orbit, benefiting both the academic community and broader aerospace applications. • Propellant-less collision avoidance maneuver via aerodynamic drag. • In-orbit flight campaigns for BEESAT-4 (1U CubeSat). • Quantification of the impact of operational constraints on the maneuver efficiency. • Improving the practical feasibility of demanding maneuvers in orbit. • Consideration and optimization of satellite operations for propellant-less orbit control.

Acta AstronauticaVol. 234
University of Stuttgart (DE), University of Würzburg (DE), Institut für Angewandte Produktions-Technologie (Germany) (DE), Technische Universität Berlin (DE)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Space Satellite Systems and Control
29.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.