Making and disposing of life's ‘starting materials’: A focus group study of attitudes concerning reproductive scarcity and abundance in in vitro gametogenesis

This paper explores stakeholder attitudes toward gametes and embryos in the context of in vitro gametogenesis (IVG), a new stem cell technology whose future clinical application would entail the production of eggs and sperm in vitro. A key concern raised by the prospect of making gametes from originally non-reproductive body cells has been its potential exacerbation of the issue of "surplus" cryopreserved embryos through the production of unprecedented numbers, with an allied devaluation of human reproductive materials. However, this concern has not been empirically investigated. In this study, focus groups composed of individuals representative of the constituency most likely to be impacted by IVG were asked to respond to scenarios in which the relative abundance and scarcity of gametes and embryos were changed by these new procedures. Respondents who had experienced involuntary childlessness and/or previously accessed in vitro fertilization (IVF) technology drew on these experiences to reason their way through future scenarios in which cells could be more fluidly exchanged over the somatic-reproductive boundary. Unfettered abundance was not found to be a key issue for these respondents. Rather, concerns focused on questions of technological control over outcomes in ARTs, cultural scripts about the preciousness of eggs moderated by concordance between the gender or the donor and the sex of the gamete, and in vitro gametes and embryos as embodiments of the often painful and costly process of attaining them.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Science & Medicine
Published
2025-05-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118146
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.70

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Making and disposing of life's ‘starting materials’: A focus group study of attitudes concerning reproductive scarcity and abundance in in vitro gametogenesis

Hannah Landecker, Anne Le Goff, Robbin Jeffries Hein
1 citations
Social Science & Medicine
Reproductive Health and Technologies
1.70
article

Making and disposing of life's ‘starting materials’: A focus group study of attitudes concerning reproductive scarcity and abundance in in vitro gametogenesis

Hannah Landecker, Anne Le Goff, Robbin Jeffries Hein
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper explores stakeholder attitudes toward gametes and embryos in the context of in vitro gametogenesis (IVG), a new stem cell technology whose future clinical application would entail the production of eggs and sperm in vitro. A key concern raised by the prospect of making gametes from originally non-reproductive body cells has been its potential exacerbation of the issue of "surplus" cryopreserved embryos through the production of unprecedented numbers, with an allied devaluation of human reproductive materials. However, this concern has not been empirically investigated. In this study, focus groups composed of individuals representative of the constituency most likely to be impacted by IVG were asked to respond to scenarios in which the relative abundance and scarcity of gametes and embryos were changed by these new procedures. Respondents who had experienced involuntary childlessness and/or previously accessed in vitro fertilization (IVF) technology drew on these experiences to reason their way through future scenarios in which cells could be more fluidly exchanged over the somatic-reproductive boundary. Unfettered abundance was not found to be a key issue for these respondents. Rather, concerns focused on questions of technological control over outcomes in ARTs, cultural scripts about the preciousness of eggs moderated by concordance between the gender or the donor and the sex of the gamete, and in vitro gametes and embryos as embodiments of the often painful and costly process of attaining them.

Social Science & MedicineVol. 379
University of California, Los Angeles (US), Institute of Genetics (CA), Institut Supérieur des Biotechnologies de Paris (FR)
Foundation for the National Institutes of Health, Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, National Institutes of Health, University of California, Los Angeles, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Reproductive Health and Technologies
1.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.