A Comparative Study of Backward Euler and Adams-Moulton Methods for Lotka-Volterra Prey-Predator Model

This research investigates the comparison between the backward Euler and Adams-Moulton methods in solving the Lotka-Volterra prey predator model, specifically analyzing the interaction between wolf and moose populations. The study aims to identify which numerical method provides a more accurate approximation of the model’s solutions. Data collected from the interactions between wolves and moose on Isle Royale from 1959 to 2019 was used, determining a carrying capacity of 21.24 for wolves and 948.15 for moose. When the initial population is below this carrying capacity, it tends to grow due to the availability of adequate resources. The comparison results revealed that the Adams-Moulton method provided the most accurate approximation, successfully achieving the primary objective of the research. The equilibrium and stability of the system were assessed by defining its dynamics through mathematical equations and evaluating the eigenvalues of the Jacobian matrix, resulting in a growth rate value of 0.5017. The system was found to be stable when the populations of moose and wolves oscillated with consistent amplitude, influenced by the growth rate. The findings emphasize the importance of carrying capacity and initial conditions in understanding equilibrium and stability in prey-predator interactions, contributing to population dynamics. This research aids in the development of effective conservation and management strategies for maintaining ecosystem balance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Computing Research and Innovation
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24191/jcrinn.v10i1.503
Primary Topic
Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Study of Backward Euler and Adams-Moulton Methods for Lotka-Volterra Prey-Predator Model

Nur Fatihah Fauzi, Nurizatul Syarfinas Ahmad Bakhtiar, Huda Zuhrah Ab Halim, Nur Izzati Khairudin et al.
Journal of Computing Research and Innovation
Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
article

A Comparative Study of Backward Euler and Adams-Moulton Methods for Lotka-Volterra Prey-Predator Model

Nur Fatihah Fauzi, Nurizatul Syarfinas Ahmad Bakhtiar, Huda Zuhrah Ab Halim, Nur Izzati Khairudin, Nadia Sajidah Mohd Sobree
article en

Abstract

This research investigates the comparison between the backward Euler and Adams-Moulton methods in solving the Lotka-Volterra prey predator model, specifically analyzing the interaction between wolf and moose populations. The study aims to identify which numerical method provides a more accurate approximation of the model’s solutions. Data collected from the interactions between wolves and moose on Isle Royale from 1959 to 2019 was used, determining a carrying capacity of 21.24 for wolves and 948.15 for moose. When the initial population is below this carrying capacity, it tends to grow due to the availability of adequate resources. The comparison results revealed that the Adams-Moulton method provided the most accurate approximation, successfully achieving the primary objective of the research. The equilibrium and stability of the system were assessed by defining its dynamics through mathematical equations and evaluating the eigenvalues of the Jacobian matrix, resulting in a growth rate value of 0.5017. The system was found to be stable when the populations of moose and wolves oscillated with consistent amplitude, influenced by the growth rate. The findings emphasize the importance of carrying capacity and initial conditions in understanding equilibrium and stability in prey-predator interactions, contributing to population dynamics. This research aids in the development of effective conservation and management strategies for maintaining ecosystem balance.

Journal of Computing Research and InnovationVol. 10(1)
Universiti Teknologi MARA (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.