Differentiated Learning and Critical Thinking Skills Development in Biology: A Systematic Literature Review

Learning biology in the 21st century requires students to master critical thinking skills to understand complex scientific concepts. However, traditional teaching methods are often ineffective in facilitating the development of these skills. Differentiated learning offers an approach that can be tailored to students' readiness, interests, and learning profiles, thus potentially improving critical thinking skills. This study examined the effectiveness of differentiated learning in developing biology students' critical thinking skills, as well as identifying effective differentiation strategies and barriers in their implementation. This research used the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method and followed the PRISMA guidelines. Literature searches were conducted on academic databases such as Scopus and Google Scholar for the period 2018-2024. Differentiated learning proved effective in improving critical thinking skills with strategies such as problem-based learning, collaborative learning, and concept mapping. Barriers found include teachers' time constraints, lack of resources, and inadequate professional training. Differentiated learning can be an effective solution to developing critical thinking skills in biology. Adequate education policy support and teacher professional development are needed to optimize the implementation of differentiated learning.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Indonesian Journal of Multidiciplinary Research
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17509/ijomr.v4i2.78729
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differentiated Learning and Critical Thinking Skills Development in Biology: A Systematic Literature Review

Sholeh Hidayat, Rizki Setiawan, Usman Usman, Rudi Repelita
Indonesian Journal of Multidiciplinary Research
Education and Critical Thinking Development
article

Differentiated Learning and Critical Thinking Skills Development in Biology: A Systematic Literature Review

Sholeh Hidayat, Rizki Setiawan, Usman Usman, Rudi Repelita
article en

Abstract

Learning biology in the 21st century requires students to master critical thinking skills to understand complex scientific concepts. However, traditional teaching methods are often ineffective in facilitating the development of these skills. Differentiated learning offers an approach that can be tailored to students' readiness, interests, and learning profiles, thus potentially improving critical thinking skills. This study examined the effectiveness of differentiated learning in developing biology students' critical thinking skills, as well as identifying effective differentiation strategies and barriers in their implementation. This research used the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method and followed the PRISMA guidelines. Literature searches were conducted on academic databases such as Scopus and Google Scholar for the period 2018-2024. Differentiated learning proved effective in improving critical thinking skills with strategies such as problem-based learning, collaborative learning, and concept mapping. Barriers found include teachers' time constraints, lack of resources, and inadequate professional training. Differentiated learning can be an effective solution to developing critical thinking skills in biology. Adequate education policy support and teacher professional development are needed to optimize the implementation of differentiated learning.

Indonesian Journal of Multidiciplinary ResearchVol. 4(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.