How to implement a clinical ethics committee in an oncological research hospital: Qualitative results from a process evaluation study using normalization process theory (EVACEC)

We identified key components to support the normalization of CECs and enable their activation within a clinical setting. An active and sustainable CEC must be visible, accessible, understood and trusted, clear in purpose, sufficiently integrated into the life of the organisation, adequately resourced, appropriately constituted and competent, accountable and independent. These findings can inform the development of practical strategies for CECs implementation and of appropriate outcomes for further evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-05-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0318870
Primary Topic
Ethics in medical practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How to implement a clinical ethics committee in an oncological research hospital: Qualitative results from a process evaluation study using normalization process theory (EVACEC)

Ludovica De Panfilis, Giorgio Gualandri, Marco Annoni, Morten Magelssen et al.
1 links
PLoS ONE
Ethics in medical practice
article

How to implement a clinical ethics committee in an oncological research hospital: Qualitative results from a process evaluation study using normalization process theory (EVACEC)

Ludovica De Panfilis, Giorgio Gualandri, Marco Annoni, Morten Magelssen, Marta Perin, Luca Ghirotto, Chiara Crico
article en

Abstract

We identified key components to support the normalization of CECs and enable their activation within a clinical setting. An active and sustainable CEC must be visible, accessible, understood and trusted, clear in purpose, sufficiently integrated into the life of the organisation, adequately resourced, appropriately constituted and competent, accountable and independent. These findings can inform the development of practical strategies for CECs implementation and of appropriate outcomes for further evaluation.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(5)
University of Oslo (NO), Azienda Sanitaria Unità Locale di Reggio Emilia (IT), Azienda USL di Bologna (IT), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), National Research Council (IT), Fondazione Umberto Veronesi (IT), Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (IT), University of Bologna (IT)
Ministero della Salute
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Ethics in medical practice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How to implement a clinical ethics committee in an oncological research hospital: Qualitative results from a process evaluation study using normalization process theory (EVACEC) — Ludovica De Panfilis, Giorgio Gualandri, et al. · PLoS ONE (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS