Integrating The PDCA Cycle for Continuous Improvement and Academic Quality Enhancement in Higher Education

Assuring academic quality against accreditation standards remains a priority for universities worldwide. Whilst academic quality is extensively studied, a gap exists in how universities approach the challenge of meeting ‘one-size-fits-all’ standards. This article discusses how an Australian university integrated the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle into its course and subject design, development, and review processes. Doing so enabled systematic data collection, analysis, identification of improvement opportunities, implementation of planned actions, and the continuous enhancement of courses and subjects. The aims of this work are: 1. Provide a background of the PDCA cycle. 2. Exemplify how the PDCA cycle may be integrated as a quality enhancement tool in the higher education sector. 3. Emphasise the value of universities adopting collaborative, data-informed approaches towards quality assurance. 4. Overview of universities adapting the cycle globally in other contexts for comparison 5. Encourage universities to share how they address the challenge of meeting ‘one-size-fits-all’ standards.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Comparative & International Higher Education
Published
2025-05-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32674/yzwgmy25
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Experimental Learning in Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.95
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating The PDCA Cycle for Continuous Improvement and Academic Quality Enhancement in Higher Education

Sheeja Samuel, Hayley Farrer
8 citations
Journal of Comparative & International Higher Education
Experimental Learning in Engineering
7.95
article

Integrating The PDCA Cycle for Continuous Improvement and Academic Quality Enhancement in Higher Education

Sheeja Samuel, Hayley Farrer
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Assuring academic quality against accreditation standards remains a priority for universities worldwide. Whilst academic quality is extensively studied, a gap exists in how universities approach the challenge of meeting ‘one-size-fits-all’ standards. This article discusses how an Australian university integrated the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle into its course and subject design, development, and review processes. Doing so enabled systematic data collection, analysis, identification of improvement opportunities, implementation of planned actions, and the continuous enhancement of courses and subjects. The aims of this work are: 1. Provide a background of the PDCA cycle. 2. Exemplify how the PDCA cycle may be integrated as a quality enhancement tool in the higher education sector. 3. Emphasise the value of universities adopting collaborative, data-informed approaches towards quality assurance. 4. Overview of universities adapting the cycle globally in other contexts for comparison 5. Encourage universities to share how they address the challenge of meeting ‘one-size-fits-all’ standards.

Journal of Comparative & International Higher EducationVol. 17(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Experimental Learning in Engineering
7.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.