Can scientists remain internationally visible after the return to their home country? A study of Chinese scientists

Returning scientists play a critical role in building up the academic workforce and <br/>science in their home country. Still, it is unclear whether return mobility limits scientists’ international relevance and thus international knowledge diffusion. Here we take scientists returning to China as a sample to investigate the effect of return mobility on international impact and explore the roles of the international collaboration and international knowledge base in this effect. We find that returnee scientists experience a decline in international impact compared to a control group of scientists who do not return, which can largely be attributed to <br/>a decrease in international collaboration. We further show that the importance of international collaboration increases post-return, moderating the effect of return mobility. Overall, these findings clarify the limitation of return mobility and provide some empirical evidence on the limits of global knowledge diffusion in science and talent attraction policies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Industry and Innovation
Published
2025-05-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2025.2499535
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Higher Education Governance and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.04

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can scientists remain internationally visible after the return to their home country? A study of Chinese scientists

Liangping Ding, Cornelia Lawson, Ying Zhang
2 citations
Industry and Innovation
Higher Education Governance and Development
17.04
article

Can scientists remain internationally visible after the return to their home country? A study of Chinese scientists

Liangping Ding, Cornelia Lawson, Ying Zhang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Returning scientists play a critical role in building up the academic workforce and <br/>science in their home country. Still, it is unclear whether return mobility limits scientists’ international relevance and thus international knowledge diffusion. Here we take scientists returning to China as a sample to investigate the effect of return mobility on international impact and explore the roles of the international collaboration and international knowledge base in this effect. We find that returnee scientists experience a decline in international impact compared to a control group of scientists who do not return, which can largely be attributed to <br/>a decrease in international collaboration. We further show that the importance of international collaboration increases post-return, moderating the effect of return mobility. Overall, these findings clarify the limitation of return mobility and provide some empirical evidence on the limits of global knowledge diffusion in science and talent attraction policies.

Industry and InnovationVol. 32(10)
Peking University (CN), Institut de Recherche et d’Innovation (FR)
National Social Science Fund of China
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Higher Education Governance and Development
17.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Can scientists remain internationally visible after the return to their home country? A study of Chinese scientists — Liangping Ding, Cornelia Lawson, et al. · Industry and Innovation (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS