Electrodynamic and Ionospheric Puzzles of the 10–11 May 2024 Geomagnetic Superstorm

Abstract On 10 May 2024, a powerful coronal mass ejection arrived at Earth at 17:05UT and caused a major geomagnetic storm. With the minimum SYM‐H excursion of −497 nT (5‐min data), this storm is the largest geomagnetic disturbance since March 1989, and can be categorized as a superstorm. In this work, by using ground‐based and space‐borne instruments, we focus on unusual aspects of the electrodynamic and ionospheric response to the May 2024 storm at middle and low latitudes. Between the storm onset at 17:05UT, and until ∼19:40UT, we observed signatures of strong unshielded prompt penetration electric fields (PPEF), which caused an increase of the equatorial ExB drifts up to 95 m/s. This led to the occurrence of a strong ionospheric super‐fountain effect. The local pre‐noon sector was the first to respond to the PPEF, with a very rapid increase of the ionization and the EIA development in the local morning sector. Whereas, in the afternoon‐evening sector the ionosphere responded with ∼2 hr of delay, and the response continued to intensify even after the equatorial ExB drifts had dropped to undisturbed values. The development of such a powerful super‐fountain effect without or with little electrodynamic forcing is difficult to explain, but it could be due to storm‐time meridional and zonal thermospheric winds. During the early recovery phase of the storm, a second positive ionospheric storm occurred over the Australian‐West Pacific region in the local late afternoon to pre‐midnight sector, driven by another ionospheric uplift associated with the occurrence of smaller‐amplitude equatorial upward ExB drifts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024ja033284
Citations
16
Primary Topic
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.32

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Electrodynamic and Ionospheric Puzzles of the 10–11 May 2024 Geomagnetic Superstorm

M. R. Hairston, Boris Maletckii, J. D. Huba, W. R. Coley et al.
16 citations
Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
17.32
article

Electrodynamic and Ionospheric Puzzles of the 10–11 May 2024 Geomagnetic Superstorm

M. R. Hairston, Boris Maletckii, J. D. Huba, W. R. Coley, Elvira Astafyeva, Ines Dahlia Ouar, M. Foerster
article en
16 citations

Abstract

Abstract On 10 May 2024, a powerful coronal mass ejection arrived at Earth at 17:05UT and caused a major geomagnetic storm. With the minimum SYM‐H excursion of −497 nT (5‐min data), this storm is the largest geomagnetic disturbance since March 1989, and can be categorized as a superstorm. In this work, by using ground‐based and space‐borne instruments, we focus on unusual aspects of the electrodynamic and ionospheric response to the May 2024 storm at middle and low latitudes. Between the storm onset at 17:05UT, and until ∼19:40UT, we observed signatures of strong unshielded prompt penetration electric fields (PPEF), which caused an increase of the equatorial ExB drifts up to 95 m/s. This led to the occurrence of a strong ionospheric super‐fountain effect. The local pre‐noon sector was the first to respond to the PPEF, with a very rapid increase of the ionization and the EIA development in the local morning sector. Whereas, in the afternoon‐evening sector the ionosphere responded with ∼2 hr of delay, and the response continued to intensify even after the equatorial ExB drifts had dropped to undisturbed values. The development of such a powerful super‐fountain effect without or with little electrodynamic forcing is difficult to explain, but it could be due to storm‐time meridional and zonal thermospheric winds. During the early recovery phase of the storm, a second positive ionospheric storm occurred over the Australian‐West Pacific region in the local late afternoon to pre‐midnight sector, driven by another ionospheric uplift associated with the occurrence of smaller‐amplitude equatorial upward ExB drifts.

Journal of Geophysical Research Space PhysicsVol. 130(5)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Institut de physique du globe de Paris (FR), The University of Texas at Dallas (US), Université Paris Cité (FR), Syntek Technologies (United States) (US), GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences (DE)
National Science Foundation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
17.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.