What explains public support for Canada's supply management regime?

Abstract We investigate elasticity of policy preferences to information about the economic effects of policy tools. We survey approximately 5,000 people and ask a referendum question about liberalizing supply management in Canada. Supply management regulates production and marketing of dairy and poultry products in Canada through production restrictions, regulated pricing, and import barriers. Support varies widely across political‐party affiliation, and across individuals with different views on redistributive fiscal policies, international trade liberalization, and perceptions of how supply management affects food prices. We estimate causal effects of information about personal costs and distributional effects of supply management on support for the policy in a randomized experiment. Treated participants receive personalized information about how supply management affects household grocery costs, and information about the policy's distributional effects. Policy support is responsive to information treatments, but these effects are small relative to differences in support across individuals' views on economic issues such as international trade and fiscal redistribution policies. We find little evidence of heterogenous treatment effects across respondent characteristics, suggesting the effects of our information treatments are not tied to views about political and economic issues.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/caje.70009
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Canadian Policy and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.04

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What explains public support for Canada's supply management regime?

Ryan Cardwell, Chad Lawley
2 citations
Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique
Canadian Policy and Governance
17.04
article

What explains public support for Canada's supply management regime?

Ryan Cardwell, Chad Lawley
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract We investigate elasticity of policy preferences to information about the economic effects of policy tools. We survey approximately 5,000 people and ask a referendum question about liberalizing supply management in Canada. Supply management regulates production and marketing of dairy and poultry products in Canada through production restrictions, regulated pricing, and import barriers. Support varies widely across political‐party affiliation, and across individuals with different views on redistributive fiscal policies, international trade liberalization, and perceptions of how supply management affects food prices. We estimate causal effects of information about personal costs and distributional effects of supply management on support for the policy in a randomized experiment. Treated participants receive personalized information about how supply management affects household grocery costs, and information about the policy's distributional effects. Policy support is responsive to information treatments, but these effects are small relative to differences in support across individuals' views on economic issues such as international trade and fiscal redistribution policies. We find little evidence of heterogenous treatment effects across respondent characteristics, suggesting the effects of our information treatments are not tied to views about political and economic issues.

Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économiqueVol. 58(2)
University of Manitoba (CA)
University of Saskatchewan, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Canadian Policy and Governance
17.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.