Emotions and Needs of Dairy Cows and Calves – a Qualitative Analysis of Non-Farming Citizens’ and Farmers’ Perspectives on Emotional Capacity, Competencies, and Consumers’ Right to have a Say

Abstract Citizens frequently judge animal welfare based on the assumed emotional impact on the animal and therewith the demands placed on animal husbandry. This study examines the perception of emotions and needs of cows and calves from a social and agricultural perspective, and whether farmers perceive the consumers’ right to have a say. Therefore, qualitative interviews with 15 farmers and 15 citizens were conducted. Both groups attributed a wide range of emotions to cows and calves but evaluated the resulting needs and the influence of emotions differently. Citizens viewed cows and calves as social and sensitive beings, with the bond between mother and calf taking center stage. This leads to the need for contact between mother and calf. In addition, important needs are seen in the husbandry environment, which also represents the main lever for influencing emotions for citizens. Farmers saw more opportunities to influence the emotions more in the direct daily contact with the animals and through health management and stress-free handling Farmers further believed that citizens have limited ability to accurately assess the emotions of cattle and rejected the idea of citizens having an influence on future housing systems. In turn, citizens attribute a high level of competence to farmers. This study contributes to a better understanding of the role that the perceived emotions and needs of cows and calves play in the perception and evaluation of dairy farming systems and how differences in views on conflict issues such as cow–calf separation can arise.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Food Ethics
Published
2025-05-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41055-025-00167-z
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.42

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Emotions and Needs of Dairy Cows and Calves – a Qualitative Analysis of Non-Farming Citizens’ and Farmers’ Perspectives on Emotional Capacity, Competencies, and Consumers’ Right to have a Say

Sarah Kühl, Flora von Steimker, Annika Gleue
4 citations
Food Ethics
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
9.42
article

Emotions and Needs of Dairy Cows and Calves – a Qualitative Analysis of Non-Farming Citizens’ and Farmers’ Perspectives on Emotional Capacity, Competencies, and Consumers’ Right to have a Say

Sarah Kühl, Flora von Steimker, Annika Gleue
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Citizens frequently judge animal welfare based on the assumed emotional impact on the animal and therewith the demands placed on animal husbandry. This study examines the perception of emotions and needs of cows and calves from a social and agricultural perspective, and whether farmers perceive the consumers’ right to have a say. Therefore, qualitative interviews with 15 farmers and 15 citizens were conducted. Both groups attributed a wide range of emotions to cows and calves but evaluated the resulting needs and the influence of emotions differently. Citizens viewed cows and calves as social and sensitive beings, with the bond between mother and calf taking center stage. This leads to the need for contact between mother and calf. In addition, important needs are seen in the husbandry environment, which also represents the main lever for influencing emotions for citizens. Farmers saw more opportunities to influence the emotions more in the direct daily contact with the animals and through health management and stress-free handling Farmers further believed that citizens have limited ability to accurately assess the emotions of cattle and rejected the idea of citizens having an influence on future housing systems. In turn, citizens attribute a high level of competence to farmers. This study contributes to a better understanding of the role that the perceived emotions and needs of cows and calves play in the perception and evaluation of dairy farming systems and how differences in views on conflict issues such as cow–calf separation can arise.

Food EthicsVol. 10(2)
Weihenstephan-Triesdorf University of Applied Sciences (DE), University of Göttingen (DE)
Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Bundesministerium für Ernährung und Landwirtschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
9.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.