Hyperparameter optimization of machine learning models for predicting actual evapotranspiration

Actual evapotranspiration (AET) is a critical component of the water cycle, essential for effective water resource planning and management. While meteorological variables can predict AET, determining the reduction of potential evapotranspiration due to soil dryness remains challenging. AET data are often unavailable, necessitating reliance on more commonly measured variables. This study uses two groups of predictor variables for AET prediction. The first group, selected through Pearson correlation, tolerance, and VIF scores to address multicollinearity, includes net CO 2 , sensible heat flux, air temperature, relative humidity, and wind speed. The second group, chosen for practical applicability, consists of soil surface temperature, air temperature, relative humidity, and wind speed. Three predictive approaches are proposed: (i) deep learning models (LSTM, GRU, CNN) and (ii) classical machine learning models (SVR, RF). Hyperparameters were optimized using Bayesian optimization and compared with grid search. Bayesian optimization demonstrated higher performance and reduced computation time. Model performance was evaluated using statistical indicators (RMSE, MSE, MAE, R 2 ). Deep learning methods outperformed classical methods, with LSTM achieving the best results (Bayesian optimization: RMSE=0.0230, MSE=0.0005, MAE=0.0139, R 2 =0.8861). Performance decreased with fewer predictors. LSTM maintained superiority, achieving R 2 =0.8861 with five predictors and R 2 =0.8467 with four. LSTM also slightly outperformed SVR with fewer predictors. Overall, deep learning methods, especially with Bayesian optimization, proved more effective than classical methods for AET prediction. Future research could explore additional predictors and machine learning models to further improve AET prediction accuracy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Machine Learning with Applications
Published
2025-05-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mlwa.2025.100661
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.32

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hyperparameter optimization of machine learning models for predicting actual evapotranspiration

Elvira Di Nardo, Rosa Meo, Stefano Ferraris, Chalachew Muluken Liyew
3 citations
Machine Learning with Applications
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
3.32
article

Hyperparameter optimization of machine learning models for predicting actual evapotranspiration

Elvira Di Nardo, Rosa Meo, Stefano Ferraris, Chalachew Muluken Liyew
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Actual evapotranspiration (AET) is a critical component of the water cycle, essential for effective water resource planning and management. While meteorological variables can predict AET, determining the reduction of potential evapotranspiration due to soil dryness remains challenging. AET data are often unavailable, necessitating reliance on more commonly measured variables. This study uses two groups of predictor variables for AET prediction. The first group, selected through Pearson correlation, tolerance, and VIF scores to address multicollinearity, includes net CO 2 , sensible heat flux, air temperature, relative humidity, and wind speed. The second group, chosen for practical applicability, consists of soil surface temperature, air temperature, relative humidity, and wind speed. Three predictive approaches are proposed: (i) deep learning models (LSTM, GRU, CNN) and (ii) classical machine learning models (SVR, RF). Hyperparameters were optimized using Bayesian optimization and compared with grid search. Bayesian optimization demonstrated higher performance and reduced computation time. Model performance was evaluated using statistical indicators (RMSE, MSE, MAE, R 2 ). Deep learning methods outperformed classical methods, with LSTM achieving the best results (Bayesian optimization: RMSE=0.0230, MSE=0.0005, MAE=0.0139, R 2 =0.8861). Performance decreased with fewer predictors. LSTM maintained superiority, achieving R 2 =0.8861 with five predictors and R 2 =0.8467 with four. LSTM also slightly outperformed SVR with fewer predictors. Overall, deep learning methods, especially with Bayesian optimization, proved more effective than classical methods for AET prediction. Future research could explore additional predictors and machine learning models to further improve AET prediction accuracy.

Machine Learning with ApplicationsVol. 20
Politecnico di Torino (IT), Department of Public Health (US), University of Turin (IT), Bahir Dar University (ET)
European Commission, Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
3.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.