Food and Drug Administration Database Secondary Analysis: Difference in Operative Hysteroscopy Device Adverse Event Reporting

While conclusions within the MAUDE database are limited, especially given the lack of data concerning the volume of surgeries done with each device and the voluntary reporting mechanism, there are significant differences in the types of adverse events reported among operative hysteroscopy instruments. Morcellation AERs had a significantly higher frequency of patient complications and described more surgical interventions compared to AERs for resectoscopes. When comparing MyoSure and TruClear, MyoSure AERs described a significantly greater proportion of serious patient complications compared to TruClear device AERs. Devices with similar functions may differ in how stakeholders report complications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
Published
2025-05-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2025.04.009
Primary Topic
Digital Imaging in Medicine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Food and Drug Administration Database Secondary Analysis: Difference in Operative Hysteroscopy Device Adverse Event Reporting

Kristin Patzkowsky, Megan E. Gornet, Anja S. Frost, Arielle N. Valdez-Sinon et al.
3 links
Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
Digital Imaging in Medicine
article

Food and Drug Administration Database Secondary Analysis: Difference in Operative Hysteroscopy Device Adverse Event Reporting

Kristin Patzkowsky, Megan E. Gornet, Anja S. Frost, Arielle N. Valdez-Sinon, Anita Monique Madison, Rand El Sharaiha
article en

Abstract

While conclusions within the MAUDE database are limited, especially given the lack of data concerning the volume of surgeries done with each device and the voluntary reporting mechanism, there are significant differences in the types of adverse events reported among operative hysteroscopy instruments. Morcellation AERs had a significantly higher frequency of patient complications and described more surgical interventions compared to AERs for resectoscopes. When comparing MyoSure and TruClear, MyoSure AERs described a significantly greater proportion of serious patient complications compared to TruClear device AERs. Devices with similar functions may differ in how stakeholders report complications.

Journal of Minimally Invasive GynecologyVol. 32(7)
Johns Hopkins University (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), Reproductive Science Center (US), RNET Technologies (United States) (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Digital Imaging in Medicine
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Food and Drug Administration Database Secondary Analysis: Difference in Operative Hysteroscopy Device Adverse Event Reporting — Kristin Patzkowsky, Megan E. Gornet, et al. · Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS