Growers’ Adoption of USDA GAP, Other Harmonized GAP & Group Produce Audits: Drivers, Constraints, and Fostering Improved Implementation

The USDA, with produce sector stakeholders, developed voluntary fee-for-service food safety audit schemes- USDA GAP&GHP, USDA Harmonized GAP (HGAP), USDA HGAP Plus+, and USDA GroupGAP- to help growers verify compliance with Good Agricultural Practices (GAPs). Aligned with produce safety regulatory requirements and designed to vary in scope and complexity, the schemes aim to meet diverse grower and buyer needs. For unclear reasons, growers' adoption of USDA GAP audit schemes remains low relative to private standards. So, using data from growers (n = 208 surveyed) and service providers (n = 55 surveyed, 7 interviewed), we explored factors influencing growers' implementation of USDA GAP programs. Buyers' requests and food safety requirements were key drivers of adoption. However, many growers cited a lack of buyers' demand for USDA GAP schemes, a key barrier to broader adoption. Small- and medium-scale growers also face technical and financial challenges inhibiting adoption, which could be addressed by government, private sector, and nonprofit stakeholders. Implementing USDA GAPs must be profitable for small growers, highlighting the need to align adoption efforts with USDA's broader strategy to connect them to profitable markets. Negative audit experiences and concerns about nonconformities escalating to the FDA deter adoption. Enhancing outreach, education, and trust through Cooperative Extension and regional networks is crucial for improved understanding, acceptance, and adoption of USDA GAP schemes. The findings call for coordinated multi-stakeholder efforts to address the economic, informational, and perceptual barriers through targeted, multipronged interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Food Protection
Published
2025-05-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100530
Primary Topic
Organic Food and Agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Growers’ Adoption of USDA GAP, Other Harmonized GAP & Group Produce Audits: Drivers, Constraints, and Fostering Improved Implementation

Leslie D. Bourquin, Jelili Adegboyega Adebiyi
Journal of Food Protection
Organic Food and Agriculture
article

Growers’ Adoption of USDA GAP, Other Harmonized GAP & Group Produce Audits: Drivers, Constraints, and Fostering Improved Implementation

Leslie D. Bourquin, Jelili Adegboyega Adebiyi
article en

Abstract

The USDA, with produce sector stakeholders, developed voluntary fee-for-service food safety audit schemes- USDA GAP&GHP, USDA Harmonized GAP (HGAP), USDA HGAP Plus+, and USDA GroupGAP- to help growers verify compliance with Good Agricultural Practices (GAPs). Aligned with produce safety regulatory requirements and designed to vary in scope and complexity, the schemes aim to meet diverse grower and buyer needs. For unclear reasons, growers' adoption of USDA GAP audit schemes remains low relative to private standards. So, using data from growers (n = 208 surveyed) and service providers (n = 55 surveyed, 7 interviewed), we explored factors influencing growers' implementation of USDA GAP programs. Buyers' requests and food safety requirements were key drivers of adoption. However, many growers cited a lack of buyers' demand for USDA GAP schemes, a key barrier to broader adoption. Small- and medium-scale growers also face technical and financial challenges inhibiting adoption, which could be addressed by government, private sector, and nonprofit stakeholders. Implementing USDA GAPs must be profitable for small growers, highlighting the need to align adoption efforts with USDA's broader strategy to connect them to profitable markets. Negative audit experiences and concerns about nonconformities escalating to the FDA deter adoption. Enhancing outreach, education, and trust through Cooperative Extension and regional networks is crucial for improved understanding, acceptance, and adoption of USDA GAP schemes. The findings call for coordinated multi-stakeholder efforts to address the economic, informational, and perceptual barriers through targeted, multipronged interventions.

Journal of Food ProtectionVol. 88(7)
Northern Michigan University (US), Michigan State University (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Michigan State University, Agricultural Marketing Service
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Organic Food and Agriculture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.