On the performance of human thermal stress models in the outdoors against observations

• Observed and modeled skin temperatures were compared for thermal stress assessment. • JOS-3 performed better than the LHEB model within the PUCM framework. • LHEB overestimates skin temperature likely due to lacking human thermoregulation. • JOS-3 can reliably link with validated UCMs for urban thermal stress evaluation. Urban overheating significantly impacts human well-being, requiring outdoor thermal comfort assessments. This research aims to assess the performance of models to calculate mean skin temperature in outdoor environments against measurements. The study compares a Lumped Human Energy Budget (LHEB) model, which is a simplified representation of the human body thermal state developed in an Urban Canopy Model (UCM), and the more sophisticated thermoregulation model JOS-3. Skin temperatures computed with the LHEB one-node model were significantly higher than observed values (RMSE: 1.71 – 2.76 °C). This variation, however, cannot be attributed to differences between simulated and monitored environmental data. It probably results from simplifications assumed in the human energy balance, such as disregarding dynamic thermoregulation processes, which considerably impact outdoor human comfort. The JOS-3 model, more advanced in terms of heat exchange and thermoregulation processes, performed better (RMSE: 0.21 – 1.62 °C, considering sessions when sensors were stabilized). Since all JOS-3 meteorological inputs can be provided by a UCM, the model can be directly integrated into UCMs for investigating the effects of urban overheating and mitigation strategies on human thermal stress. Therefore, it can serve as the human thermal comfort module for UCMs. The collected dataset is the first to combine measurements of the biophysical energy model outputs and the required UCM inputs, and to evaluate the reliability of the LHEB and the JOS-3 models outdoors, contributing to improve thermal stress modeling in inter-building urban contexts, which is an important approach for cities livability improvement and designing effective human-centric heat reduction measures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy and Buildings
Published
2025-05-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.115837
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Urban Heat Island Mitigation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.80
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the performance of human thermal stress models in the outdoors against observations

Elie Bou‐Zeid, Ioannis Kousis, Roberta Jacoby Cureau, Ilaria Pigliautile et al.
1 citations
Energy and Buildings
Urban Heat Island Mitigation
0.80
article

On the performance of human thermal stress models in the outdoors against observations

Elie Bou‐Zeid, Ioannis Kousis, Roberta Jacoby Cureau, Ilaria Pigliautile, Xinjie Huang, Anna Laura Pisello
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• Observed and modeled skin temperatures were compared for thermal stress assessment. • JOS-3 performed better than the LHEB model within the PUCM framework. • LHEB overestimates skin temperature likely due to lacking human thermoregulation. • JOS-3 can reliably link with validated UCMs for urban thermal stress evaluation. Urban overheating significantly impacts human well-being, requiring outdoor thermal comfort assessments. This research aims to assess the performance of models to calculate mean skin temperature in outdoor environments against measurements. The study compares a Lumped Human Energy Budget (LHEB) model, which is a simplified representation of the human body thermal state developed in an Urban Canopy Model (UCM), and the more sophisticated thermoregulation model JOS-3. Skin temperatures computed with the LHEB one-node model were significantly higher than observed values (RMSE: 1.71 – 2.76 °C). This variation, however, cannot be attributed to differences between simulated and monitored environmental data. It probably results from simplifications assumed in the human energy balance, such as disregarding dynamic thermoregulation processes, which considerably impact outdoor human comfort. The JOS-3 model, more advanced in terms of heat exchange and thermoregulation processes, performed better (RMSE: 0.21 – 1.62 °C, considering sessions when sensors were stabilized). Since all JOS-3 meteorological inputs can be provided by a UCM, the model can be directly integrated into UCMs for investigating the effects of urban overheating and mitigation strategies on human thermal stress. Therefore, it can serve as the human thermal comfort module for UCMs. The collected dataset is the first to combine measurements of the biophysical energy model outputs and the required UCM inputs, and to evaluate the reliability of the LHEB and the JOS-3 models outdoors, contributing to improve thermal stress modeling in inter-building urban contexts, which is an important approach for cities livability improvement and designing effective human-centric heat reduction measures.

Energy and BuildingsVol. 341
Università degli Studi eCampus (IT), Princeton University (US), University of Perugia (IT), UNSW Sydney (AU), University for Foreigners Perugia (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Urban Heat Island Mitigation
0.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.