Validation and correction of photoelastic techniques for frictional granular systems

Abstract Photoelasticity is a popular tool to measure the internal stresses of many transparent materials, with numerous industrial, medical and research applications. Importantly for this work, photoelastic techniques can be used to provide quantitative diagnostics for experimental studies of two-dimensional granular flows of circular discs. In this paper, we introduce a novel photoelastic testing apparatus and present the first experimental validation of photoelastic techniques being used to quantify frictional forces acting on cylindrical particles. In this case, the forces acting on the photoelastic particles have both normal and tangential components. Additionally, we perform a quantitative error analysis and obtain bounds on the spatial imaging resolution required to produce accurate photoelastic results from experimental data. Our results verify that photoelasticity can be used reliably to calculate and quantify normal and tangential forces in experimental granular systems, and also give insight into the range of forcing conditions that photoelastic techniques are most accurate. This information is of critical importance to researchers who are designing, running and analysing photoelastic experiments. During our own experiments, we discovered a mathematical error in the widely used open-source Photoelastic Grain Solver (PeGS) code. Much of the current photoelastic research depends on the effectiveness of PeGS, and we found that the error leads to incorrect output from experimental data whenever there are tangential components to any of the inter-particle forces. In this work, we outline the error, quantify its effect and provide a fix to ensure accurate output from the code. The photoelastic community has corroborated and validated our updated version of the software, and we have amended the open-source version of the code to include the modifications outlined in this article.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Measurement Science and Technology
Published
2025-05-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/add48b
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Granular flow and fluidized beds
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.34

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation and correction of photoelastic techniques for frictional granular systems

Brian G. McMillan, Stuart B. Dalziel, Nathalie Vriend
4 citations
Measurement Science and Technology
Granular flow and fluidized beds
5.34
article

Validation and correction of photoelastic techniques for frictional granular systems

Brian G. McMillan, Stuart B. Dalziel, Nathalie Vriend
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Photoelasticity is a popular tool to measure the internal stresses of many transparent materials, with numerous industrial, medical and research applications. Importantly for this work, photoelastic techniques can be used to provide quantitative diagnostics for experimental studies of two-dimensional granular flows of circular discs. In this paper, we introduce a novel photoelastic testing apparatus and present the first experimental validation of photoelastic techniques being used to quantify frictional forces acting on cylindrical particles. In this case, the forces acting on the photoelastic particles have both normal and tangential components. Additionally, we perform a quantitative error analysis and obtain bounds on the spatial imaging resolution required to produce accurate photoelastic results from experimental data. Our results verify that photoelasticity can be used reliably to calculate and quantify normal and tangential forces in experimental granular systems, and also give insight into the range of forcing conditions that photoelastic techniques are most accurate. This information is of critical importance to researchers who are designing, running and analysing photoelastic experiments. During our own experiments, we discovered a mathematical error in the widely used open-source Photoelastic Grain Solver (PeGS) code. Much of the current photoelastic research depends on the effectiveness of PeGS, and we found that the error leads to incorrect output from experimental data whenever there are tangential components to any of the inter-particle forces. In this work, we outline the error, quantify its effect and provide a fix to ensure accurate output from the code. The photoelastic community has corroborated and validated our updated version of the software, and we have amended the open-source version of the code to include the modifications outlined in this article.

Measurement Science and TechnologyVol. 36(5)
University of Colorado Boulder (US), University of Cambridge (GB)
Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, Royal Society
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Granular flow and fluidized beds
5.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.