Therapeutic enhancement effects using a lower energy 2.5 MV photon beam combined with gold nanoparticles on the BxPC-3 pancreatic cancer cell line, <i>in vitro</i>

<i>Objective</i>. This study investigates the feasibility of using a clinically relevant lower energy 2.5 megavoltage (MV) photon beam in combination with gold nanoparticles (GNPs).<i>Approach.</i>Pancreatic cancer cell line, BxPC-3 impregnated with GNPs were exposed<i>in vitro</i>to 2.5 MV photon beam and compared with orthovoltage 225 kV and clinical 6 MV photon beam. Bare, 50 nm diameter, spherical GNPs were introduced in the cell culture 24 h prior to irradiation at a concentration of either 10<i>μ</i>g ml<sup>-1</sup>or 50<i>μ</i>g ml<sup>-1</sup>. GNP uptake was determined using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy. The cells were irradiated with doses between 0 Gy to 8 Gy. Cell survival curves were obtained via clonogenic assay using immediate or delayed plating (24 h) methods 12 d after irradiation. The terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling assay was used to evaluate DNA damage at two time points post irradiation, immediate and 24 h for 1 Gy and 6 Gy.<i>Main results</i>. The enhancement factor (EF) in BxPC-3 cells was greatest for cells incubated with 50<i>μ</i>g ml<sup>-1</sup>of GNPs analyzed immediately post irradiation. Cells irradiated with 225 kV showed greatest EF (1.57 ± 0.15), followed by 2.5 MV (1.51 ± 0.04). The lowest EF was seen for 6 MV, immediate plating (1.10 ± 0.04). A significant increase in the number of DNA double strand breaks (DSB) was observed in cells incubated with 50<i>μ</i>g ml<sup>-1</sup>of GNPs irradiated at 6 Gy with 225 kV and 2.5 MV. There was no significant increase in DSBs for the cells irradiated with 6 MV.<i>Significance.</i>These results suggest that the 2.5 MV could be a compromise between an orthovoltage energy beam and a clinical 6 MV beam, showing comparable reduction in cell survival to the 225 kV beam. Future GNP radiation enhancement research may focus on intermediate energy beams.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Published
2025-05-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/add4b8
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.52

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Therapeutic enhancement effects using a lower energy 2.5 MV photon beam combined with gold nanoparticles on the BxPC-3 pancreatic cancer cell line, in vitro

Amandeep Taggar, Eric Da Silva, Rao Khan, Raffi Karshafian et al.
1 citations
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
1.52
article

Therapeutic enhancement effects using a lower energy 2.5 MV photon beam combined with gold nanoparticles on the BxPC-3 pancreatic cancer cell line, in vitro

Amandeep Taggar, Eric Da Silva, Rao Khan, Raffi Karshafian, Sarah Sabatinos, James L Gräfe, Diana Ha, Xianyun Yao
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<i>Objective</i>. This study investigates the feasibility of using a clinically relevant lower energy 2.5 megavoltage (MV) photon beam in combination with gold nanoparticles (GNPs).<i>Approach.</i>Pancreatic cancer cell line, BxPC-3 impregnated with GNPs were exposed<i>in vitro</i>to 2.5 MV photon beam and compared with orthovoltage 225 kV and clinical 6 MV photon beam. Bare, 50 nm diameter, spherical GNPs were introduced in the cell culture 24 h prior to irradiation at a concentration of either 10<i>μ</i>g ml<sup>-1</sup>or 50<i>μ</i>g ml<sup>-1</sup>. GNP uptake was determined using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy. The cells were irradiated with doses between 0 Gy to 8 Gy. Cell survival curves were obtained via clonogenic assay using immediate or delayed plating (24 h) methods 12 d after irradiation. The terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling assay was used to evaluate DNA damage at two time points post irradiation, immediate and 24 h for 1 Gy and 6 Gy.<i>Main results</i>. The enhancement factor (EF) in BxPC-3 cells was greatest for cells incubated with 50<i>μ</i>g ml<sup>-1</sup>of GNPs analyzed immediately post irradiation. Cells irradiated with 225 kV showed greatest EF (1.57 ± 0.15), followed by 2.5 MV (1.51 ± 0.04). The lowest EF was seen for 6 MV, immediate plating (1.10 ± 0.04). A significant increase in the number of DNA double strand breaks (DSB) was observed in cells incubated with 50<i>μ</i>g ml<sup>-1</sup>of GNPs irradiated at 6 Gy with 225 kV and 2.5 MV. There was no significant increase in DSBs for the cells irradiated with 6 MV.<i>Significance.</i>These results suggest that the 2.5 MV could be a compromise between an orthovoltage energy beam and a clinical 6 MV beam, showing comparable reduction in cell survival to the 225 kV beam. Future GNP radiation enhancement research may focus on intermediate energy beams.

Physics in Medicine and BiologyVol. 70(10)
St. Michael's Hospital (CA), Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA), Howard University (US), University of Toronto (CA), Health Sciences Centre (CA), Metropolitan University (RS), St. John’s Health Sciences Centre (CA), Toronto Zoo (CA), Toronto Metropolitan University (CA)
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
1.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.