Advancing Holistic Decision‐Making Systems in Schools: Insights From Academic Research and Practical Applications

ABSTRACT Background There is growing recognition in the education sector of the critical role empirical data plays in aiding strategic decision‐making and supporting personalised learning. The call for increased and more nuanced data‐driven decision‐making has been primarily addressed by the institutional use of student learning dashboards and learner profiles in higher education; their application and evaluation in K‐12 settings remain underexplored. Existing approaches often lack robust empirical evidence, and there is limited research addressing their use in real‐world classroom environments. Objectives and Methods This study aims to bridge the knowledge gap by systematically reviewing both academic and non‐peer‐reviewed literature on decision‐making systems in schools. The review focused on understanding the types of data used, the implementation status of dashboards and learner profiles, and the practical applications in K‐2 education. The analysis included 19 academic papers as well as 10 pieces of non‐peer‐reviewed literature to examine the landscape of decision‐making systems. Results The analysis revealed that while academic literature highlights the underuse of diverse data types and a scarcity of real‐world evaluations, non‐peer‐reviewed literature showcases promising holistic decision‐making approaches employed by schools and government bodies globally. However, these practical applications often lack empirical validation. Conclusions This study provides a novel contribution by exploring how researchers can move beyond stand‐alone studies focusing on academic performance to gauge the success of different decision‐making systems. The study also recommends that practitioners invest in more research‐backed systems to create better teaching and learning practices and enhance personalised learning. By highlighting the current gaps and offering forward‐looking recommendations, our study clarifies the present landscape and serves as a foundation for future research to improve student learning outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
Published
2025-05-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.70021
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.08

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advancing Holistic Decision‐Making Systems in Schools: Insights From Academic Research and Practical Applications

Abhinava Barthakur, Rebecca Marrone, Shadi Esnaashari, Shane Dawson et al.
3 citations
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
Online Learning and Analytics
5.08
article

Advancing Holistic Decision‐Making Systems in Schools: Insights From Academic Research and Practical Applications

Abhinava Barthakur, Rebecca Marrone, Shadi Esnaashari, Shane Dawson, Vitomir Kovanović
article en
3 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background There is growing recognition in the education sector of the critical role empirical data plays in aiding strategic decision‐making and supporting personalised learning. The call for increased and more nuanced data‐driven decision‐making has been primarily addressed by the institutional use of student learning dashboards and learner profiles in higher education; their application and evaluation in K‐12 settings remain underexplored. Existing approaches often lack robust empirical evidence, and there is limited research addressing their use in real‐world classroom environments. Objectives and Methods This study aims to bridge the knowledge gap by systematically reviewing both academic and non‐peer‐reviewed literature on decision‐making systems in schools. The review focused on understanding the types of data used, the implementation status of dashboards and learner profiles, and the practical applications in K‐2 education. The analysis included 19 academic papers as well as 10 pieces of non‐peer‐reviewed literature to examine the landscape of decision‐making systems. Results The analysis revealed that while academic literature highlights the underuse of diverse data types and a scarcity of real‐world evaluations, non‐peer‐reviewed literature showcases promising holistic decision‐making approaches employed by schools and government bodies globally. However, these practical applications often lack empirical validation. Conclusions This study provides a novel contribution by exploring how researchers can move beyond stand‐alone studies focusing on academic performance to gauge the success of different decision‐making systems. The study also recommends that practitioners invest in more research‐backed systems to create better teaching and learning practices and enhance personalised learning. By highlighting the current gaps and offering forward‐looking recommendations, our study clarifies the present landscape and serves as a foundation for future research to improve student learning outcomes.

Journal of Computer Assisted LearningVol. 41(3)
Johns Hopkins University (US), University of South Australia (AU)
University of South Australia
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Online Learning and Analytics
5.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.