Strategic Communication and Metamodernism. Shall We Dance? Towards Complexity Beyond Linear Compromise

This article is the result of further joint reflection by the authors, building on their previous arguments that the shifts that gave rise to strategic communication as a discipline suggest linear compromises between modernism and postmodernism. It also provides a scrutiny of metamodernism as a contemporary academic agenda within a complexity framework, and explores whether strategic communication has to an extent not always shown elements of metamodernism. Following an analysis of key figures of metamodern thought and introducing the “dance” of the double pendulum as a metaphor, the authors discuss key challenges that metamodern thinking poses to strategic communication scholars. These require, among other things, a commitment to the species, ironic sincerity, a commitment to complexity on the problem as well as on the solution side, and a “both‒and” realist epistemology and constructionist epistemology at the same time. In conclusion, implications for strategic communication are put forward.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communicare Journal for Communication Studies in Africa
Published
2025-05-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36615/ka65me09
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strategic Communication and Metamodernism. Shall We Dance? Towards Complexity Beyond Linear Compromise

Howard Nothhaft, Nina Overton-de Klerk
2 citations
Communicare Journal for Communication Studies in Africa
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
7.73
article

Strategic Communication and Metamodernism. Shall We Dance? Towards Complexity Beyond Linear Compromise

Howard Nothhaft, Nina Overton-de Klerk
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This article is the result of further joint reflection by the authors, building on their previous arguments that the shifts that gave rise to strategic communication as a discipline suggest linear compromises between modernism and postmodernism. It also provides a scrutiny of metamodernism as a contemporary academic agenda within a complexity framework, and explores whether strategic communication has to an extent not always shown elements of metamodernism. Following an analysis of key figures of metamodern thought and introducing the “dance” of the double pendulum as a metaphor, the authors discuss key challenges that metamodern thinking poses to strategic communication scholars. These require, among other things, a commitment to the species, ironic sincerity, a commitment to complexity on the problem as well as on the solution side, and a “both‒and” realist epistemology and constructionist epistemology at the same time. In conclusion, implications for strategic communication are put forward.

Communicare Journal for Communication Studies in AfricaVol. 44(1)
Lund University (SE), University of Johannesburg (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
7.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Strategic Communication and Metamodernism. Shall We Dance? Towards Complexity Beyond Linear Compromise — Howard Nothhaft, Nina Overton-de Klerk · Communicare Journal for Communication Studies in Africa (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS