Predicting the high-strain-rate deformation behavior and constructing processing maps of 304L stainless steel through machine learning and deep learning

This study deals with predicting the high-temperature compressive flow behavior of stainless steel 304L employing the machine learning and deep learning algorithms. An special focus has been laid on the high strain rate regime, where the phenomenological models are basically incapable of precise predicting. Uniaxial compression tests were conducted at temperatures of 700, 800, and 900 °C and strain rates of 0.1, 1, 10, 30, 50 and 100 s -1 . An Arrhenius-type model was employed as the phenomenological approach. However, due to the significant variation of activation energy and strain rate sensitivity parameters across the wide range of strain rates, it exhibited limited accuracy in predicting the flow stress behavior. Random forest and artificial neural network, demonstrated superior performance. These models were optimized through hyperparameter tuning to enhance their predictive capabilities, and the models were evaluated using standard statistical metrics. Both the random forest and artificial neural network models effectively predicted flow stress levels and captured the strain hardening and flow softening behavior of the material. The Random Forest model was optimized with various parameters, and the best performance came from a tree depth of 15, 150 estimators, and 150 leaf nodes. The Artificial Neural Network (ANN) was tested with various hidden layer and neuron configurations. The optimal model was a three-layer architecture with an input layer, a hidden layer of 20 neurons, and an output layer. Furthermore, the random forest model was used to construct processing maps, identifying safe and unsafe processing zones.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Materials Research and Technology
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2025.05.009
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Metallurgy and Material Forming
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.18
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting the high-strain-rate deformation behavior and constructing processing maps of 304L stainless steel through machine learning and deep learning

M. Ghaffari Farid, Roghayeh Ghasempour, Peter Hodgson, Andrew Taylor et al.
6 citations
Journal of Materials Research and Technology
Metallurgy and Material Forming
5.18
article

Predicting the high-strain-rate deformation behavior and constructing processing maps of 304L stainless steel through machine learning and deep learning

M. Ghaffari Farid, Roghayeh Ghasempour, Peter Hodgson, Andrew Taylor, H.R. Abedi, Shahin Khoddam
article en
6 citations

Abstract

This study deals with predicting the high-temperature compressive flow behavior of stainless steel 304L employing the machine learning and deep learning algorithms. An special focus has been laid on the high strain rate regime, where the phenomenological models are basically incapable of precise predicting. Uniaxial compression tests were conducted at temperatures of 700, 800, and 900 °C and strain rates of 0.1, 1, 10, 30, 50 and 100 s -1 . An Arrhenius-type model was employed as the phenomenological approach. However, due to the significant variation of activation energy and strain rate sensitivity parameters across the wide range of strain rates, it exhibited limited accuracy in predicting the flow stress behavior. Random forest and artificial neural network, demonstrated superior performance. These models were optimized through hyperparameter tuning to enhance their predictive capabilities, and the models were evaluated using standard statistical metrics. Both the random forest and artificial neural network models effectively predicted flow stress levels and captured the strain hardening and flow softening behavior of the material. The Random Forest model was optimized with various parameters, and the best performance came from a tree depth of 15, 150 estimators, and 150 leaf nodes. The Artificial Neural Network (ANN) was tested with various hidden layer and neuron configurations. The optimal model was a three-layer architecture with an input layer, a hidden layer of 20 neurons, and an output layer. Furthermore, the random forest model was used to construct processing maps, identifying safe and unsafe processing zones.

Journal of Materials Research and TechnologyVol. 36
Deakin University (AU), Iran University of Science and Technology (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Metallurgy and Material Forming
5.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.