Did cities increase skills during industrialization? Evidence from rural-urban migration

The process of industrialization is typically associated with urbanization and a large urban-rural gap in productivity and skills. To what extent were these disparities driven by the direct impact on occupational attainment of living in an urban area or the result of the positive self-selection of migrants moving to cities? In this paper, we leverage exceptional Swedish longitudinal data that allow us to estimate the impact of rural-urban migration on occupational attainment during Sweden’s industrialization from the 1880s to the 1930s using a staggered treatment difference-in-differences estimator. We attribute roughly half of the urban premium to a direct impact of living in an urban area, whereas the other half is driven by self-selection into cities. A third of the direct impact of residing in cities is explained by a static effect, reflecting the urban advantage, while the rest is the result of a dynamic effect as individuals move into higher-skilled occupations over time in urban areas.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Urban Economics
Published
2025-05-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2025.103772
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Did cities increase skills during industrialization? Evidence from rural-urban migration

Jakob Molinder, Jonatan Andersson
2 citations
Journal of Urban Economics
Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis
6.26
article

Did cities increase skills during industrialization? Evidence from rural-urban migration

Jakob Molinder, Jonatan Andersson
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The process of industrialization is typically associated with urbanization and a large urban-rural gap in productivity and skills. To what extent were these disparities driven by the direct impact on occupational attainment of living in an urban area or the result of the positive self-selection of migrants moving to cities? In this paper, we leverage exceptional Swedish longitudinal data that allow us to estimate the impact of rural-urban migration on occupational attainment during Sweden’s industrialization from the 1880s to the 1930s using a staggered treatment difference-in-differences estimator. We attribute roughly half of the urban premium to a direct impact of living in an urban area, whereas the other half is driven by self-selection into cities. A third of the direct impact of residing in cities is explained by a static effect, reflecting the urban advantage, while the rest is the result of a dynamic effect as individuals move into higher-skilled occupations over time in urban areas.

Journal of Urban EconomicsVol. 148
Uppsala University (SE)
Jan Wallanders och Tom Hedelius Stiftelse samt Tore Browaldhs Stiftelse, Vetenskapsrådet
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis
6.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.