Within-field variation of actual and maximum winter wheat yield in relation to crop management

The potential magnitude of agronomic yield gain through management is rarely explored at the field scale. Increasing yield through greater use of inputs without considering local potential yield may pose environmental and economic risks. i) examine yield gain through increased management intensity, including irrigation, and how it varies within and between fields, ii) evaluate the environmental and economic risks of uniform N-rates within fields. Field experiments were performed at three sites, with varying yield potential, in each of 12 fields with winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) in Sweden over three years. Irrigated and rainfed maximum yield under non-limiting cropping inputs (Yim and Ym), actual yield under conventional management (Ya), and yield gains (Yim-Ym and Ym-Ya) were determined. More frequent pest control was most effective to increase yields, followed by higher fertilizer rates. However, within-field yield variation, relative to the lowest yield recorded in the field, was, on average, similar for Ya and Ym but reduced by irrigation (Yim). Thus, water limitation was the main reason for within-field yield variations, possibly related to soil texture. Actual and maximum yields vary between and within fields. This variation cannot be entirely compensated for by intensified management. Therefore uniform yield levels within fields should not be strived for, instead site-specific optimal levels should be the goal. The within-field variation in yield needs to be considered as N rates based on site-specific yield levels within fields were found to be more profitable than uniform N rates. • Irrigated and rainfed maximum yields were 15 % and 8 % above actual yield (Ya). • Yield gains were achieved by site specific management within fields. • Irrigation levelled out within-field yield variation related to soil texture. • Within-field yield variation persisted after higher fertilizer and pesticide rates. • Adapting N-rates to yield and soil N supply within field was profitable.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Field Crops Research
Published
2025-05-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2025.109965
Primary Topic
Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Within-field variation of actual and maximum winter wheat yield in relation to crop management

Elisabet Lewan, K. Persson, Karin Blombäck, Bo Stenberg et al.
Field Crops Research
Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
article

Within-field variation of actual and maximum winter wheat yield in relation to crop management

Elisabet Lewan, K. Persson, Karin Blombäck, Bo Stenberg, Anders Larsolle, Elsa Coucheney, Åsa Myrbeck, Lena Engström
article en

Abstract

The potential magnitude of agronomic yield gain through management is rarely explored at the field scale. Increasing yield through greater use of inputs without considering local potential yield may pose environmental and economic risks. i) examine yield gain through increased management intensity, including irrigation, and how it varies within and between fields, ii) evaluate the environmental and economic risks of uniform N-rates within fields. Field experiments were performed at three sites, with varying yield potential, in each of 12 fields with winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) in Sweden over three years. Irrigated and rainfed maximum yield under non-limiting cropping inputs (Yim and Ym), actual yield under conventional management (Ya), and yield gains (Yim-Ym and Ym-Ya) were determined. More frequent pest control was most effective to increase yields, followed by higher fertilizer rates. However, within-field yield variation, relative to the lowest yield recorded in the field, was, on average, similar for Ya and Ym but reduced by irrigation (Yim). Thus, water limitation was the main reason for within-field yield variations, possibly related to soil texture. Actual and maximum yields vary between and within fields. This variation cannot be entirely compensated for by intensified management. Therefore uniform yield levels within fields should not be strived for, instead site-specific optimal levels should be the goal. The within-field variation in yield needs to be considered as N rates based on site-specific yield levels within fields were found to be more profitable than uniform N rates. • Irrigated and rainfed maximum yields were 15 % and 8 % above actual yield (Ya). • Yield gains were achieved by site specific management within fields. • Irrigation levelled out within-field yield variation related to soil texture. • Within-field yield variation persisted after higher fertilizer and pesticide rates. • Adapting N-rates to yield and soil N supply within field was profitable.

Field Crops ResearchVol. 329
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE)
Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.