Circumferential strain and strain rates of the descending aorta as novel measures of aortic stiffness and wall mechanics from standard cardiac MRI

During standard cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) the horizontal long-axis cine image (i.e., 4-chamber) is captured which includes a cross-section of the descending aorta. The aortic cross-section can be used to assess aortic stiffness (distensibility; ∆area/pressure) or circumferential strain (percentage vascular deformation). We examined whether descending aortic strain from traditional CMR is sensitive to age- and disease-related (heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; HFpEF) arteriosclerosis. We recruited 83 participants into three groups: (1) 34 young individuals (age: 22 ± 3 years; body mass index (BMI): 24.3 ± 2.8 kg/m<sup>2</sup>); (2) 19 older individuals (age: 69 ± 5 years; BMI: 26.9 ± 4.7 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) and (3) 26 patients with HFpEF (age: 69 ± 6 years; BMI: 35.8 ± 6.1 kg/m<sup>2</sup>). All participants were studied in the same 3 T scanner (Phillips, Achieva). Descending aortic cross-sectional area and circumferential strain were measured using cvi<sup>42</sup> software. Blood pressure was measured via a brachial oscillometric cuff. Data were compared via ANOVA. All data are reported as means ± standard deviation. Compared to the young group (71 ± 5 mmHg), mean arterial pressure was higher in the older (83 ± 9 mmHg, P < 0.001) and HFpEF groups (86 ± 10 mmHg, P < 0.001). Minimum and maximum aortic areas were greater in the older and HFpEF groups (both, P < 0.01). Peak descending aortic strain (young: 11.4% ± 2.2%; older: 4.8% ± 1.6%; HFpEF 3.8% ± 1.6%) and absolute distension were lower (all, P < 0.02) in the older and HFpEF groups compared to the young. Peak descending aortic strain and strain rates are sensitive to age and may provide a novel assessment of arterial stiffness for longitudinal studies that utilize or have utilized CMR.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Experimental Physiology
Published
2025-05-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1113/ep092585
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.78

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Circumferential strain and strain rates of the descending aorta as novel measures of aortic stiffness and wall mechanics from standard cardiac MRI

Syed Mohammad Imran Majeed, Joshua A. Beckman, James P. MacNamara, Andrew P. Oneglia et al.
2 citations
Experimental Physiology
Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
2.78
article

Circumferential strain and strain rates of the descending aorta as novel measures of aortic stiffness and wall mechanics from standard cardiac MRI

Syed Mohammad Imran Majeed, Joshua A. Beckman, James P. MacNamara, Andrew P. Oneglia, Denis J. Wakeham, Benjamin D. Levine, Satyam Sarma, Tiffany Brazile, Sauyeh K. Zamani, Mark J. Haykowsky, Michael D. Nelson, Matthew M. Howrey, Christopher M. Hearon, Vlad G. Zaha
article en
2 citations

Abstract

During standard cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) the horizontal long-axis cine image (i.e., 4-chamber) is captured which includes a cross-section of the descending aorta. The aortic cross-section can be used to assess aortic stiffness (distensibility; ∆area/pressure) or circumferential strain (percentage vascular deformation). We examined whether descending aortic strain from traditional CMR is sensitive to age- and disease-related (heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; HFpEF) arteriosclerosis. We recruited 83 participants into three groups: (1) 34 young individuals (age: 22 ± 3 years; body mass index (BMI): 24.3 ± 2.8 kg/m<sup>2</sup>); (2) 19 older individuals (age: 69 ± 5 years; BMI: 26.9 ± 4.7 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) and (3) 26 patients with HFpEF (age: 69 ± 6 years; BMI: 35.8 ± 6.1 kg/m<sup>2</sup>). All participants were studied in the same 3 T scanner (Phillips, Achieva). Descending aortic cross-sectional area and circumferential strain were measured using cvi<sup>42</sup> software. Blood pressure was measured via a brachial oscillometric cuff. Data were compared via ANOVA. All data are reported as means ± standard deviation. Compared to the young group (71 ± 5 mmHg), mean arterial pressure was higher in the older (83 ± 9 mmHg, P < 0.001) and HFpEF groups (86 ± 10 mmHg, P < 0.001). Minimum and maximum aortic areas were greater in the older and HFpEF groups (both, P < 0.01). Peak descending aortic strain (young: 11.4% ± 2.2%; older: 4.8% ± 1.6%; HFpEF 3.8% ± 1.6%) and absolute distension were lower (all, P < 0.02) in the older and HFpEF groups compared to the young. Peak descending aortic strain and strain rates are sensitive to age and may provide a novel assessment of arterial stiffness for longitudinal studies that utilize or have utilized CMR.

Experimental PhysiologyVol. 111(1)
University of Alberta (CA), The University of Texas at Arlington (US), Presbyterian Hospital (US), Institute for Exercise and Environmental Medicine (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
American Heart Association, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
2.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.