Simulation study on coal and ammonia co-firing in a tangential firing boiler under different ammonia injection methods
As a new zero-carbon fuel, ammonia co-firing in coal-fired boilers is one of the feasible technologies for reducing carbon emission. This study validated an ammonia-coal co-firing simulation model using experimental data from a 300 MW unit tangential firing boiler, and investigated the impacts of different ammonia injection methods (uniform injection, lower layer concentrated injection and upper layer concentrated injection) at 20% ammonia co-firing ratio on boiler performance. Key findings include flow fields characteristics: uniform injection enhanced the tangential flow pattern, while pure ammonia burners in concentrated injection modes exhibited weaker tangential momentum compared to coal burners; combustion and temperature fields: all the three injection methods reduced peak furnace temperatures but increased flue gas temperature at furnace outlet; coal burnout performance: uniform injection and lower layer concentrated injection inhibited coal burnout, whereas upper layer concentrated injection promoted it; NO<sub>x</sub> emissions: both uniform injection and lower layer injection reduced NO<sub>x</sub> emissions, while upper layer injection significantly increased them. These conclusions provide critical guidance for retrofitting power plant boilers for ammonia co-firing.
Authors
- Yu Tsun Cheng
- Haiyan Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1437-4383)
- Shidong Fang
- Yuwei Chen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0148-3609)
- Hansheng Feng (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5178-252X)
- Wangping Sun
- Qifu Lin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2669-4058)
- Huaqing Ya
Institutions
- National Science Centre (PL)
- Tongling Nonferrous Metals Group Holding (China) (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Scientific Reports
- Published
- 2025-05-06
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-98792-5
- Citations
- 4
- Primary Topic
- Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.70
Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China
- Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China
- Anhui Provincial Department of Education
- Anhui Provincial Development and Reform Commission
- National Key Research and Development Program of China