A Prospective, Controlled, Randomised, Clinical Study of Negative Pressure Device Without Foam or Gauze for Skin and Soft Tissue Defects

All common negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) systems include a filler material usually foam or gauze at the wound/device interface. The filler material distributes the negative pressure evenly to all parts of the wound. The foam or gauze may fragment contributing to foreign material being retained in the wound, becoming colonised with bacteria over time, and painful dressing changes. To mitigate these, negative aspects, an impermeable embossed single-layer NPWT membrane dressing has been developed. The dressing has been coined Negative Pressure-Platform Wound Device (NP-PWD) and a foam or gauze is not required to deliver negative pressure. Rather, the pressure is permeated via the spaces between the embossed pyramids and the wrinkles in the membrane. The purpose of this study was to compare the NP-PWD to the standard of care (SOC) NPWT system in the treatment of skin and soft tissue defects. This was a prospective, randomised, controlled clinical trial. The wounds were treated with the NP-PWD or SOC NPWT system. The randomised treatment was applied for 2 days to up to 9 days after the initial application. Follow-up data were collected at each dressing change/removal and included photographs, and assessments for wound healing, infection, and adverse events. In total 24 subjects (12 NP-PWD and 12 SOC) completed the study. The NP-PWD was easy to use and fast to apply and the patients tolerated it well. The transparency of the NP-PWD allowed the provider to see the wound without removing the dressing which is an improvement over traditional NPWT. In terms of wound healing, inflammation, pain, and infection, no differences were observed between the NP-PWD and the SOC NPWT system. The NP-PWD is a simplified, single component NPWT system eliminating the use of the filler material that commonly causes challenges during treatment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Wound Journal
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.70144
Primary Topic
Surgical site infection prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Prospective, Controlled, Randomised, Clinical Study of Negative Pressure Device Without Foam or Gauze for Skin and Soft Tissue Defects

Michael Broomhead, Elof Eriksson, Kristin Anselmo, Victoria Diaz et al.
International Wound Journal
Surgical site infection prevention
article

A Prospective, Controlled, Randomised, Clinical Study of Negative Pressure Device Without Foam or Gauze for Skin and Soft Tissue Defects

Michael Broomhead, Elof Eriksson, Kristin Anselmo, Victoria Diaz, Rodney K. Chan, Kristo Nuutila
article en

Abstract

All common negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) systems include a filler material usually foam or gauze at the wound/device interface. The filler material distributes the negative pressure evenly to all parts of the wound. The foam or gauze may fragment contributing to foreign material being retained in the wound, becoming colonised with bacteria over time, and painful dressing changes. To mitigate these, negative aspects, an impermeable embossed single-layer NPWT membrane dressing has been developed. The dressing has been coined Negative Pressure-Platform Wound Device (NP-PWD) and a foam or gauze is not required to deliver negative pressure. Rather, the pressure is permeated via the spaces between the embossed pyramids and the wrinkles in the membrane. The purpose of this study was to compare the NP-PWD to the standard of care (SOC) NPWT system in the treatment of skin and soft tissue defects. This was a prospective, randomised, controlled clinical trial. The wounds were treated with the NP-PWD or SOC NPWT system. The randomised treatment was applied for 2 days to up to 9 days after the initial application. Follow-up data were collected at each dressing change/removal and included photographs, and assessments for wound healing, infection, and adverse events. In total 24 subjects (12 NP-PWD and 12 SOC) completed the study. The NP-PWD was easy to use and fast to apply and the patients tolerated it well. The transparency of the NP-PWD allowed the provider to see the wound without removing the dressing which is an improvement over traditional NPWT. In terms of wound healing, inflammation, pain, and infection, no differences were observed between the NP-PWD and the SOC NPWT system. The NP-PWD is a simplified, single component NPWT system eliminating the use of the filler material that commonly causes challenges during treatment.

International Wound JournalVol. 22(5)
United States Army Institute of Surgical Research (US), Applied Tissue Technologies (United States) (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Surgical site infection prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.