Land cover attributes affect the distribution of rooting damage by wild pigs ( <i>Sus scrofa</i> )

Abstract The rapid expansion of invasive wild pig ( Sus scrofa ) populations over the past several decades has resulted in an increased distribution of damage to native systems throughout their introduced range. Despite the extent of wild pig damage and growing concerns among land managers, there is limited published data regarding the variability of damage in relation to season and fine‐scale land cover attributes. We assessed wild pig rooting damage during the winter (January‐March) and summer (June‐August) of 2020 along 36 km of 10‐m‐wide transects on the Savannah River Site (SRS) and 34 km of 10‐m‐wide transects on privately owned agricultural (POA) properties in South Carolina, USA. We recorded fine‐scale land cover attributes at damage and control sites to determine the factors that were most closely associated with wild pig rooting damage. We reported 6,825.5 m 2 of rooting damage over 36 km of survey transects on the SRS and 3,146.9 m 2 of rooting damage over 34 km of survey transects on the POA properties over winter and summer seasons. The average depth of rooting damage was 11.8 cm on the SRS and 11.2 cm on the POA properties. Our modeling results suggested rooting by wild pigs was more likely to occur in earlier winter months, in hardwood stands, proximal to water, and in areas with less ground vegetation and greater stem density, and less likely to occur in areas with greater tree density and near roads. Our results can help facilitate early detection of wild pig expansion by highlighting key areas to monitor for wild pig presence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Wildlife Management
Published
2025-05-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.70032
Primary Topic
Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Land cover attributes affect the distribution of rooting damage by wild pigs ( Sus scrofa )

James C. Beasley, J Treichler, Kurt C. VerCauteren, Travis E. Stoakley
Journal of Wildlife Management
Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
article

Land cover attributes affect the distribution of rooting damage by wild pigs ( Sus scrofa )

James C. Beasley, J Treichler, Kurt C. VerCauteren, Travis E. Stoakley
article en

Abstract

Abstract The rapid expansion of invasive wild pig ( Sus scrofa ) populations over the past several decades has resulted in an increased distribution of damage to native systems throughout their introduced range. Despite the extent of wild pig damage and growing concerns among land managers, there is limited published data regarding the variability of damage in relation to season and fine‐scale land cover attributes. We assessed wild pig rooting damage during the winter (January‐March) and summer (June‐August) of 2020 along 36 km of 10‐m‐wide transects on the Savannah River Site (SRS) and 34 km of 10‐m‐wide transects on privately owned agricultural (POA) properties in South Carolina, USA. We recorded fine‐scale land cover attributes at damage and control sites to determine the factors that were most closely associated with wild pig rooting damage. We reported 6,825.5 m 2 of rooting damage over 36 km of survey transects on the SRS and 3,146.9 m 2 of rooting damage over 34 km of survey transects on the POA properties over winter and summer seasons. The average depth of rooting damage was 11.8 cm on the SRS and 11.2 cm on the POA properties. Our modeling results suggested rooting by wild pigs was more likely to occur in earlier winter months, in hardwood stands, proximal to water, and in areas with less ground vegetation and greater stem density, and less likely to occur in areas with greater tree density and near roads. Our results can help facilitate early detection of wild pig expansion by highlighting key areas to monitor for wild pig presence.

Journal of Wildlife ManagementVol. 89(5)
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (US), United States Department of Agriculture (US), University of Georgia (US)
U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Environmental Management, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.