Challenges and Solutions for Measuring Taxonomic Richness of Aquatic Invertebrates in Wetlands

ABSTRACT Measurements of biodiversity are crucial to assessing the ecological integrity of ecosystems. However, adequately describing the range of organisms existing in habitats can be challenging, especially for the taxonomically rich invertebrates. We analysed six large datasets designed to describe the taxonomic richness of aquatic invertebrate assemblages in depressional freshwater wetlands from various regions or locations (in North America, southern Africa and South America). Three of the datasets targeted large numbers of wetlands (57–163 sites), sampled once and the other three datasets repeatedly sampled over longer time periods (5–23 years), but targeted a smaller number of wetlands (10–18). We estimated the total number of invertebrate taxa that likely existed for each target area (Chao estimator), as opposed to how much of that richness was actually collected by each effort (using taxon‐accumulation curves). The most ambitious effort (17 wetlands, 23 years, 5–6 samplings per year) captured 95% of the aquatic invertebrate taxa projected to occur in the study area; none of the other five efforts captured appreciably more than 80% of the projected total richness per study area. Findings suggest that capturing 90% or more of regional taxa is truly laborious and should not be a primary goal for efforts to sample the invertebrate fauna in wetlands. Objectives for sampling wetland invertebrates should be tailored to address what is realistic, knowing that as much as 30% of taxa may be missed by even ambitious efforts. As a potential solution, we suggest setting feasible objectives for wetlands macroinvertebrate assessments. We recommend researchers try to reach a 70% study area richness target by sampling 60–80 wetlands once or smaller sets of wetlands for 2–3 years.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Freshwater Biology
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.70042
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Challenges and Solutions for Measuring Taxonomic Richness of Aquatic Invertebrates in Wetlands

Kyle I. McLean, Darold P. Batzer, Walter Mauricio Dromaz, Matthew S. Bird et al.
1 citations
Freshwater Biology
Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
1.72
article

Challenges and Solutions for Measuring Taxonomic Richness of Aquatic Invertebrates in Wetlands

Kyle I. McLean, Darold P. Batzer, Walter Mauricio Dromaz, Matthew S. Bird, Luis B. Epele, Musa C. Mlambo
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Measurements of biodiversity are crucial to assessing the ecological integrity of ecosystems. However, adequately describing the range of organisms existing in habitats can be challenging, especially for the taxonomically rich invertebrates. We analysed six large datasets designed to describe the taxonomic richness of aquatic invertebrate assemblages in depressional freshwater wetlands from various regions or locations (in North America, southern Africa and South America). Three of the datasets targeted large numbers of wetlands (57–163 sites), sampled once and the other three datasets repeatedly sampled over longer time periods (5–23 years), but targeted a smaller number of wetlands (10–18). We estimated the total number of invertebrate taxa that likely existed for each target area (Chao estimator), as opposed to how much of that richness was actually collected by each effort (using taxon‐accumulation curves). The most ambitious effort (17 wetlands, 23 years, 5–6 samplings per year) captured 95% of the aquatic invertebrate taxa projected to occur in the study area; none of the other five efforts captured appreciably more than 80% of the projected total richness per study area. Findings suggest that capturing 90% or more of regional taxa is truly laborious and should not be a primary goal for efforts to sample the invertebrate fauna in wetlands. Objectives for sampling wetland invertebrates should be tailored to address what is realistic, knowing that as much as 30% of taxa may be missed by even ambitious efforts. As a potential solution, we suggest setting feasible objectives for wetlands macroinvertebrate assessments. We recommend researchers try to reach a 70% study area richness target by sampling 60–80 wetlands once or smaller sets of wetlands for 2–3 years.

Freshwater BiologyVol. 70(5)
United States Geological Survey (US), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR), University of Georgia (US), Rhodes University (ZA), University of Johannesburg (ZA), National University of Patagonia San Juan Bosco (AR), Centro de Investigación y Extensión Forestal Andino Patagónico (AR), Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center
Fulbright Association, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.