Quality work in the future: New directions via a co-evolving sociotechnical systems perspective

We face the situation of radical change in work due to advances in AI and related digital technologies, with uncertainty about how this change will affect workers’ opportunities for meaningful work designs, as well as the flow-on effects for worker well-being, health, skills and productivity. A ‘technocentric fallacy’ assumes that technology itself is the primary driver of successful digital transformation. Yet we have learned from history that technological considerations alone are insufficient for human well-being and productivity. The long-established sociotechnical systems theory of work design advocates that the social aspects of work (e.g. leadership, culture, task allocations) and technical aspects of work (e.g. AI, robots) need to be jointly optimised to achieve quality work. In this article, we expand this theoretical approach to fit current challenges, and to enable its wider-scale application. Our team of social and technical scholars propose a ‘co-evolving’ sociotechnical systems’ (CeSTS) approach to the design, implementation, and use of digital technology in work contexts. CeSTS expands thinking across time and across levels of analysis to create a more proactive, and ultimately more balanced, approach. Achieving CeSTS requires interdisciplinary collaboration, methods that can track dynamic and emergent change, and a multi-stakeholder approach that both informs research and shapes change in work. Altogether, the radical changes in technology demand an equally radical shift in how scholars investigate, and ultimately help to shape, future work. JEL Classification: 033

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Journal of Management
Published
2025-05-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03128962251331813
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Safety Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quality work in the future: New directions via a co-evolving sociotechnical systems perspective

Frank Vetere, Marek Kowalkiewicz, Sharon K. Parker, Mark Billinghurst et al.
10 citations
Australian Journal of Management
Occupational Health and Safety Research
15.40
article

Quality work in the future: New directions via a co-evolving sociotechnical systems perspective

Frank Vetere, Marek Kowalkiewicz, Sharon K. Parker, Mark Billinghurst, Tim Miller, Mark Griffin, Wafa Johal, Maureen F. Dollard, Dean Lusher, Karina Jorritsma, Jeannie Paterson, Catherine Collins, Toby Walsh, Char-lee McLennan, Timothy Ballard, Eva Kyndt, Andrew Neal
article en
10 citations

Abstract

We face the situation of radical change in work due to advances in AI and related digital technologies, with uncertainty about how this change will affect workers’ opportunities for meaningful work designs, as well as the flow-on effects for worker well-being, health, skills and productivity. A ‘technocentric fallacy’ assumes that technology itself is the primary driver of successful digital transformation. Yet we have learned from history that technological considerations alone are insufficient for human well-being and productivity. The long-established sociotechnical systems theory of work design advocates that the social aspects of work (e.g. leadership, culture, task allocations) and technical aspects of work (e.g. AI, robots) need to be jointly optimised to achieve quality work. In this article, we expand this theoretical approach to fit current challenges, and to enable its wider-scale application. Our team of social and technical scholars propose a ‘co-evolving’ sociotechnical systems’ (CeSTS) approach to the design, implementation, and use of digital technology in work contexts. CeSTS expands thinking across time and across levels of analysis to create a more proactive, and ultimately more balanced, approach. Achieving CeSTS requires interdisciplinary collaboration, methods that can track dynamic and emergent change, and a multi-stakeholder approach that both informs research and shapes change in work. Altogether, the radical changes in technology demand an equally radical shift in how scholars investigate, and ultimately help to shape, future work. JEL Classification: 033

Australian Journal of Management
Queensland University of Technology (AU), The University of Queensland (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), University of South Australia (AU), Curtin University (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU), Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Occupational Health and Safety Research
15.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.