Exploring the outcomes of open strategy and an open organisational climate: A configurational approach

This article investigates the contingencies that lead to outcomes from two levels of organisational openness. First is the strategy level of ‘open strategy’, where we focus on inclusiveness and transparency of strategy-making and the use of IT tools to facilitate such processes. Second is the operational level relating to an open organisational climate, where we focus on autonomy in operations, integration between different departments, and involvement in operational (non-strategy) decision-making. By collecting data from 49 cases of strategy-making in organisations and using a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) approach for data analysis, we have devised configurations of the aforementioned factors that lead to positive and negative outcomes. The article discusses these configurations with prior literature and concludes by illustrating their theoretical and practical implications. JEL Classification: M15

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Journal of Management
Published
2025-05-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03128962251329118
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the outcomes of open strategy and an open organisational climate: A configurational approach

Hessam Sarooghi, Sahar Najafikhah, Alireza Amrollahi, Josh Morton
2 citations
Australian Journal of Management
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
8.40
article

Exploring the outcomes of open strategy and an open organisational climate: A configurational approach

Hessam Sarooghi, Sahar Najafikhah, Alireza Amrollahi, Josh Morton
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This article investigates the contingencies that lead to outcomes from two levels of organisational openness. First is the strategy level of ‘open strategy’, where we focus on inclusiveness and transparency of strategy-making and the use of IT tools to facilitate such processes. Second is the operational level relating to an open organisational climate, where we focus on autonomy in operations, integration between different departments, and involvement in operational (non-strategy) decision-making. By collecting data from 49 cases of strategy-making in organisations and using a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) approach for data analysis, we have devised configurations of the aforementioned factors that lead to positive and negative outcomes. The article discusses these configurations with prior literature and concludes by illustrating their theoretical and practical implications. JEL Classification: M15

Australian Journal of Management
Butler University (US), University of Leeds (GB), Queensland University of Technology (AU), Macquarie University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
8.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.