Stepping together

Abstract We present our shared research journey. To place it in context, we briefly describe the history of stepfamily scholarship in four phases, highlighting our roles. We reflect on our mutual experiences as spouses who were research partners, and finish with thoughts about our contributions to the field. Although we occasionally examined sociocultural contexts within which stepfamilies lived, most of our attention focused on how stepfamily members developed and maintained satisfying and effective relationships. We also chronicled and critiqued the state of knowledge about stepfamilies by writing multiple reviews. For nearly 50 years, we have studied stepfamilies from a normative‐adaptive, resilience perspective. Our motivation was to explore issues that mattered to stepfamily members and to professionals who interacted with them. Being remarried facilitated the quality of our scholarship in many ways, although we faced challenges as well. We conclude with a brief discussion of our contributions to the study of stepfamilies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Family Theory & Review
Published
2025-05-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12626
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Family Dynamics and Relationships
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.59
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stepping together

Lawrence H.Ganong, Marilyn Coleman
1 citations
Journal of Family Theory & Review
Family Dynamics and Relationships
5.59
article

Stepping together

Lawrence H.Ganong, Marilyn Coleman
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract We present our shared research journey. To place it in context, we briefly describe the history of stepfamily scholarship in four phases, highlighting our roles. We reflect on our mutual experiences as spouses who were research partners, and finish with thoughts about our contributions to the field. Although we occasionally examined sociocultural contexts within which stepfamilies lived, most of our attention focused on how stepfamily members developed and maintained satisfying and effective relationships. We also chronicled and critiqued the state of knowledge about stepfamilies by writing multiple reviews. For nearly 50 years, we have studied stepfamilies from a normative‐adaptive, resilience perspective. Our motivation was to explore issues that mattered to stepfamily members and to professionals who interacted with them. Being remarried facilitated the quality of our scholarship in many ways, although we faced challenges as well. We conclude with a brief discussion of our contributions to the study of stepfamilies.

Journal of Family Theory & ReviewVol. 17(2)
University of Missouri (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Family Dynamics and Relationships
5.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Stepping together — Lawrence H.Ganong, Marilyn Coleman · Journal of Family Theory & Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS