Criteria For Agreement When Conducting Local Consensus Discussions: A Qualitative Study
These domains provide a structured framework for classifying consensus criteria when conducting local consensus discussions in healthcare. The findings broaden our understanding of consensus in local healthcare discussions, moving beyond a singular focus on unanimity. By clearly defining consensus types, organisations can strategically select consensus methods that best support decision-making and intervention implementation.
Authors
- Gaston Arnolda (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4948-7633)
- Emilie Francis‐Auton (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9632-2298)
- Lisa Pagano (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2869-5671)
- Mitchell Sarkies (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7318-3598)
- Andrew Hirschhorn
- Janet C. Long (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0553-682X)
- Jeffrey Braithwaite (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0296-4957)
Institutions
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Sydney Local Health District (AU)
- Macquarie University (AU)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Healthcare Leadership
- Published
- 2025-05-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.2147/jhl.s522784
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- Evaluation and Performance Assessment
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 6.32
Funders
- Macquarie University
- Medical Research Council
- National Health and Medical Research Council