A cross-sectional study assessing Pro-VC-Be short-form questionnaire in Canada; measuring psychosocial determinants of vaccination behavior in Canadian healthcare professionals

Vaccine hesitancy poses a significant challenge to worldwide public health and has been exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, leading to heightened polarization and the spread of misinformation. Addressing vaccine hesitancy requires multifaceted strategies in which healthcare professionals (HCPs) play a critical role. Nonetheless, HCPs may also be hesitant toward vaccination. The 31-item original Pro-VC-Be tool, designed to measure the psychosocial determinants of vaccine attitudes in HCPs, was first validated in France, French-speaking Belgian regions, and Quebec (Canada). The validity of a short-form version was evaluated and found to be comparable to that of the long-form. Given differing vaccination recommendations and the changing pandemic context, assessing the tool's stability among diverse Canadian HCPs is crucial. Relying on the original short version of the Pro-VC-Be tool, a cross-sectional online survey was conducted among various Canadian HCPs (<i>N</i> = 544) to explore the psychosocial determinants that impact vaccination-related behaviors (frequency of general vaccination activity, vaccine recommendations activity, and willingness to recommend vaccines). The findings underscore three crucial dimensions - vaccine confidence, proactive efficacy, and trust in authorities - as robust predictors of positive professional practice and attitudes, and thus globally support the results obtained in previous studies using the Pro-VC-Be tool. HCPs with higher vaccine confidence, high proactive efficacy, and higher trust in authorities were 80% and 180% more likely to recommend vaccines to their patients and 80% more likely to have received a COVID-19 vaccine than other HCPs, respectively. By identifying the root causes of vaccine hesitancy among HCPs, adapted strategies can be developed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
Published
2025-05-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2025.2499345
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A cross-sectional study assessing Pro-VC-Be short-form questionnaire in Canada; measuring psychosocial determinants of vaccination behavior in Canadian healthcare professionals

Catherine Pelletier, Arnaud Gagneur, Marie-Ève Trottier, Ève Dubé et al.
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
article

A cross-sectional study assessing Pro-VC-Be short-form questionnaire in Canada; measuring psychosocial determinants of vaccination behavior in Canadian healthcare professionals

Catherine Pelletier, Arnaud Gagneur, Marie-Ève Trottier, Ève Dubé, Marina Rousseau, Samuel Lemaire‐Paquette, Pierre Verger, David J. Roy
article en

Abstract

Vaccine hesitancy poses a significant challenge to worldwide public health and has been exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, leading to heightened polarization and the spread of misinformation. Addressing vaccine hesitancy requires multifaceted strategies in which healthcare professionals (HCPs) play a critical role. Nonetheless, HCPs may also be hesitant toward vaccination. The 31-item original Pro-VC-Be tool, designed to measure the psychosocial determinants of vaccine attitudes in HCPs, was first validated in France, French-speaking Belgian regions, and Quebec (Canada). The validity of a short-form version was evaluated and found to be comparable to that of the long-form. Given differing vaccination recommendations and the changing pandemic context, assessing the tool's stability among diverse Canadian HCPs is crucial. Relying on the original short version of the Pro-VC-Be tool, a cross-sectional online survey was conducted among various Canadian HCPs (<i>N</i> = 544) to explore the psychosocial determinants that impact vaccination-related behaviors (frequency of general vaccination activity, vaccine recommendations activity, and willingness to recommend vaccines). The findings underscore three crucial dimensions - vaccine confidence, proactive efficacy, and trust in authorities - as robust predictors of positive professional practice and attitudes, and thus globally support the results obtained in previous studies using the Pro-VC-Be tool. HCPs with higher vaccine confidence, high proactive efficacy, and higher trust in authorities were 80% and 180% more likely to recommend vaccines to their patients and 80% more likely to have received a COVID-19 vaccine than other HCPs, respectively. By identifying the root causes of vaccine hesitancy among HCPs, adapted strategies can be developed.

Human Vaccines & ImmunotherapeuticsVol. 21(1)
Université de Sherbrooke (CA), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke (CA), Southeastern Health (US), Université Laval (CA)
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.